Protracted copy number alteration evolution in Barrett's oesophagus leading to oesophageal cancer
Gabbutt, C.; Fernandez-Sanroman, A.; Grant, H.; Milite, S.; Cross, W. C.; Wright, N. A.; Maley, C. C.; Sottoriva, A.; Caravagna, G.; Paulson, T. G.; Graham, T. A.
Show abstract
The accrual of somatic copy number alterations (CNAs) in the premalignant condition Barrett's oesophagus (BO) predicts transformation to oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC). The dynamics of CNA evolution, namely when CNAs first appear and their rate of clonal expansion, are unknown. Here we show that CNAs typically begin to accrue in BO many decades prior to first clinical detection of BO or cancer occurrence, and in some cases during childhood. We constructed a hierarchical Bayesian methodology called CARBINE to calculate the calendar year occurrence time of CNAs from single-timepoint contemporary genetic data. We analysed data from 80 individuals who had received longitudinal endoscopic surveillance of their BO and had known cancer progression status. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) on chromosome 9p tended to be the first CNA event and often occurred when patients were between 10-30 years old. Genome doubling (GD), known to be a strong risk factor for cancer development, also typically originated multiple decades prior to cancer develop and the GD clone expanded very slowly. Patients who progressed to OAC had an enrichment of CNAs late in life. CNA accrual dynamics were more predictive of cancer risk than CNA burden measurements alone. Analysis of 97 OAC whole genomes, of which 38 had sufficient purity for CNA timing analysis, confirmed the early-life origins of CNAs found in the cancer and indicated that the seeds of OAC exist within an increasingly cancerised BO field for many years. CNA timing shows that the malignant transformation potential of BO may be recorded within the somatic genome in the first decades of life, giving a strong rationale for the effectiveness of risk stratification in early life for Barrett's patients.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Recurrent disruption of tumour suppressor genes in cancer by somatic mutations in cleavage and polyadenylation signals 91%
- A distinct cardiopharyngeal mesoderm genetic hierarchy establishes antero-posterior patterning of esophagus striated muscle 91%
- An NKX2-1/ERK/WNT feedback loop modulates gastric identity and response to targeted therapy in lung adenocarcinoma 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic architectures of proximal and distal colorectal cancer are partly distinct 92%
- Low coverage whole genome sequencing of low-grade dysplasia strongly predicts colorectal cancer risk in ulcerative colitis 92%
- Genetic variation at 11q23.1 confers colorectal cancer risk by dysregulation of colonic tuft cell transcriptional activator POU2AF2 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.