SARS-CoV-2 infection detection efficiency in Denmark before major vaccine impacts
Westfall, M. N.; Hoiby, N.; Rasmussen, S.; Ziock, H.-J.
Show abstract
To deal with the COVID-19 pandemic, Denmark implemented an aggressive program aimed at controlling the pandemic which included both testing and contact tracing programs. The large amount of data collected in Denmark on the pandemic and its integrated nature made it possible to investigate the effectiveness of the testing and contact tracing effort. The results of that investigation and a discussion of the effectiveness and limitations of the different control efforts are reported herein, as are lessons learned concerning possible improvements for the future. The analysis is limited to the period from the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in Denmark (late Feb. 2020) into May 2021, at which time the impact of vaccination intervention was already playing a role with ~25% of the Danish population at least partially vaccinated. From the available data sets we estimate the national Infection Detection Efficiency (IDE) starting around July 1, 2020, the time at which the national infection detection program started to be implemented in a more robust form. The results rely on daily COVID-19 hospital admissions, PCR test results, and anti-body prevalence values for the Danish population. We find that for the long-term average, the combined Danish national testing and contact tracing program identified on average about 55 to 60% of the infected individuals during the period from Sept. 1, 2020, into early May 2021. However, higher infection detection efficiencies were achieved in localized areas for short time intervals. Our investigations further indicate that the Danish testing and contact tracing program, which was among the most ambitious in the world, could have had a better balance between voluntary probing on the one hand and focused contact tracing and targeted testing on the other hand. As typically implemented, it proved to be largely ineffective in controlling the pandemic. However, in at least one case when it was implemented in an enhanced and focused mode, it was able to bring a large local outbreak that dominated the country's cases under control. We have compiled a list of lessons learned regarding the use of contact tracing procedures to control potential future pandemics before vaccinations become available.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Uncertainty and Inconsistency of COVID-19 Non-Pharmaceutical Intervention Effects with Multiple Competitive Statistical Models 94%
- Strategies for COVID-19 vaccination under a shortage scenario: a geo-stochastic modelling approach 94%
- Extended compartmental model for modeling COVID-19 epidemic in Slovenia 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the COVID-19 responses of Belgium, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom, February-June 2020: A counterfactual modelling study 93%
- Non-pharmaceutical interventions and vaccinating school children required to contain SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant outbreaks in Australia: a modelling analysis 92%
- SARS-CoV-2 infection risk during delivery of childhood vaccination campaigns: a modelling study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adaptive time-dependent priors and Bayesian inference to evaluate SARS-CoV-2 public health measures validated on 31 countries 94%
- Mortality of the COVID-19 outbreak in Sweden in relation to previous severe disease outbreaks 92%
- Uncovering COVID-19 Transmission Tree: Identifying Traced and Untraced Infections in an Infection Network 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 Transmission Within Danish Households: A Nationwide Study from Lockdown to Reopening 90%
- Impact of mass testing during an epidemic rebound of SARS-CoV-2: A modelling study 90%
- Attribution of invasive group A streptococcal infections to varicella and respiratory virus circulation, the Netherlands, 2010-2023 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.