Epidemiologic shifts predict spatial patterns of measles re-emergence in the United States
Kumar, C. K.; Stoffel, L. A.; Warren, J. L.; Blumberg, S.; Schechter, R.; Bubar, K. M.; Fattah, M.; Kiang, M. V.; Maldonado, Y.; Mordecai, E. A.; Hotez, P. J.; Lipsitch, M.; Lo, N. C.
Show abstract
Globally, measles is re-emerging in countries that have previously achieved elimination, including the United States. As immunization rates decline, characterizing the dynamics and evolving spatial pattern of measles re-emergence is critical to inform the public health response. We analyze annual county-level measles cases and vaccine coverage data in the United States (US) from 2011-2025 and find a shift in measles epidemiology in recent years indicative of re-emergence. While outbreak risk is spatially concentrated, we find that outbreaks are increasingly spreading throughout the broader population and across counties, but targeted interventions are predicted to prevent re-emergence nationwide. During the first decade of this period (2011-2020), outbreaks were only weakly associated with county-level vaccine coverage and predominantly isolated to single counties; however, recently (2021-2025), vaccine coverage has become strongly associated with outbreak size and spread across neighboring counties has increased. These findings suggest that measles transmission is increasingly sustained across the broader population rather than only in socially clustered communities. We developed a spatial statistical model to predict outbreak risk and size in all US counties with validation over 2021-2025; the model predicted counties with [≥]10 cases with a sensitivity of 95% (range across 2021-2025: 75-100%) and specificity of 83% (64-98%). Mechanistic models based on county vaccine coverage alone had worse performance, particularly in predicting larger outbreaks. Using the spatial statistical model, we find that prioritizing interventions in the areas of greatest model-predicted risk (e.g., top decile of US counties) was more impactful than state-level interventions (e.g., top five states) or targeting based on low vaccine coverage alone. Achieving even modest (5 percentage point) increases in vaccine coverage in counties in the top decile of model-predicted risk reduced long-term measles risk nationwide by over 90%. Together, these findings demonstrate that predictive risk modeling to inform spatially targeted interventions can likely mitigate the re-emergence of vaccine-preventable diseases.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Burden is in the eye of the beholder: Sensitivity of yellow fever disease burden estimates to modeling assumptions 92%
- Quantifying the impact of SARS-CoV-2 temporal vaccination trends and disparities on disease control 92%
- Transmission Dynamics of and Insights from the 2018-2019 Measles Outbreak in New York City: A Modeling Study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2 transmission dynamics in South Africa and epidemiological characteristics of the Omicron variant 93%
- Reducing RSV hospitalisation in a lower-income country by vaccinating mothers-to-be and their households 92%
- Repeated introductions and intensive community transmission fueled a mumps virus outbreak in Washington State 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The potential impact of Omicron and future variants of concern on SARS-CoV-2 transmission dynamics and public health burden: a modelling study 92%
- Characterizing Spatial Epidemiology in a Heterogeneous Transmission Landscape Using a Novel Spatial Transmission Count Statistic 92%
- Adherence and sustainability of interventions informing optimal control against COVID-19 pandemic 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.