Mapping county-level tick-borne disease risk in Illinois by integrating vector abundance, pathogen prevalence, and phenology
Hussain, A.; Bhowmick, S.; Mateus-Pinilla, N.; Smith, R. L.
Show abstract
Tick-borne disease risk reflects the combined influence of vector abundance, pathogen prevalence, human exposure, and seasonal activity, yet these components are rarely integrated at the county level. We developed species-specific ecological risk scores for three medically important tick species (Acari: Ixodidae): Amblyomma americanum (L.), Dermacentor variabilis (Say), and Ixodes scapularis Say, across all 102 Illinois counties using data from 2019 to 2022. County-level predicted tick abundance and pathogen prevalence were scaled and combined using equal weights to generate primary vector-level risk scores. Robustness to the equal-weight assumption was evaluated by systematically varying the relative weights assigned to abundance and pathogen prevalence, while a separate sensitivity analysis incorporated reported tick-bite incidence where available. Associations with human disease were evaluated using negative binomial regression of tick-borne disease case counts on the corresponding risk scores, with county population included as an offset. Monthly phenology indicators were constructed by integrating human disease cases, reported tick bites, and sampled tick abundance and were evaluated in relation to temperature and precipitation. Seasonal risk was estimated by combining county-level vector risk with species-specific monthly phenology, generating monthly risk surfaces that were deployed through an interactive R Shiny application. Higher risk scores were significantly associated with greater disease case rates for each tick species. County rankings were highly stable under moderate changes in abundance and prevalence weighting. Seasonal activity differed among species, with A. americanum and D. variabilis showing concentrated warm-season risk and I. scapularis exhibiting a broader seasonal profile. These county-level seasonal risk maps identify where and when relative tick-borne disease risk is elevated in Illinois, supporting targeted prevention, surveillance, and clinical awareness.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Phenology of questing Ixodes frontalis nymphs reveals a late-winter to early-spring activity peak 94%
- A two-year study on the phenology, host and habitat associations, and pathogens of Haemaphysalis longicornis in Virginia, U.S.A. 93%
- Prevalence of Bourbon and Heartland viruses in field collected ticks at an environmental field station in St. Louis County, Missouri, USA 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Field-validation of multiple species distribution models shows variation in performance for predicting Aedes albopictus distributions at the invasion edge 93%
- A three-years assessment of Ixodes ricinus-borne pathogens in a French peri-urban forest 93%
- The wild life of ticks: using passive surveillance to determine the distribution and wildlife host range of ticks and the exotic Haemaphysalis longicornis, 2010-2021 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling Approaches for Predicting the Distribution of skin NTDs: A Systematic Review 93%
- Human Trypanosoma cruzi infection risk is driven by eco-social interactions in rural communities of the Argentine Chaco 93%
- Invasive plants facilitated by socioeconomic change shelter vectors of scrub typhus and spotted fever 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Microclimate and larval habitat density predict adult Aedes albopictus abundance in urban areas 94%
- Spatiotemporal tools for emerging and endemic disease hotspots in small areas--an analysis of dengue and chikungunya in Barbados, 2013 - 2016 92%
- The effects of host availability and fitness on Aedes albopictus blood feeding patterns in New York 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.