Back

Focus or Feeding: A Quantitative Analysis of Prescribed Amphetamines in Human Milk

Yamada, E.; Stark, A.; Burdine, J.; Donikini, L.; Datta, P.; Krutsch, K.

2026-10-20 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.10.14.26365136 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective: Amphetamine (AMP) and its derivates are commonly prescribed for the management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This study aimed to 1) quantify AMP's transfer into human milk in lactating women receiving therapeutic doses and 2) contextualize infant exposure. Methods: Milk samples and dyad health histories of thirteen lactating women treated with varying doses of either mixed AMP, dextroamphetamine, or lisdexamfetamine were released for this study from the InfantRisk Human Milk Biorepository. Milk drug concentrations were quantified by validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and used to calculate standard relative infant dose (RIDmat) and RID standardized to the defined daily dose (RIDDDD) of 15 mg AMP base. Results: Average milk concentrations (Cavg) of AMP base ranged from 23.3 to 297.0 ng/mL and increased linearly (R^2 = 0.92) with maternal daily dose. The RIDmat ranged 3.6-10.8% and RIDDDD ranged 1.4-21.8%. The fitted regression line crossed the 10% RIDDDD threshold at 1.17x DDD, with the upper 95% prediction limit crossing at 0.84x DDD. No adverse event reported by the mother-infant dyads were attributed to AMP exposure, notably including absence of reduced milk supply. Conclusions:The levels of AMP observed in human milk followed a dose predictable manner. The average patient was predicted to remain below the 10% RID DDD safety threshold at total daily doses at or below approximately 28 mg of mixed AMP salts or 59 mg of lisdexamfetamine. Ninety-five percent of patients were predicted to remain below the threshold at or below approximately 20 mg and 40 mg, respectively.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.