Accuracy and completeness of death recording in primary care electronic health records compared with national death registrations in England using OpenSAFELY-TPP
Pesce, M.; Hulme, W. J.; Kyomuhangi, I.; Prestige, E.; Evans, D.; Wong, S. Y.; Goldacre, B.; Bacon, S. C.; Mehrkar, A.; OpenSAFELY Collaborative, ; MacKenna, B.; Schaffer, A. L.
Show abstract
Introduction: Primary care electronic health records (EHRs) are an important resource for health research, but death recording in primary care EHRs may be incomplete or differ from Office for National Statistics (ONS) death registrations. We used OpenSAFELY-TPP to assess the completeness and concordance of death recording and provide recommendations for using date-of-death information. Methods: Using linked primary care EHRs and ONS death registrations, we assessed whether ONS-registered deaths from 2020-2025 had a primary care date of death and, where present, calculated the difference between dates. Where a primary care date was absent, we assessed death-related SNOMED CT codes. Analyses were conducted overall and by year, population subgroup, and general practice. We also examined GP registration end dates and primary-care-recorded deaths without a corresponding ONS record, including monthly patterns near the data extraction date. Results: Among 1,409,275 ONS-registered deaths, 88% had the same date recorded in primary care and 8% had no corresponding primary care date. Among 1,324,995 deaths recorded in primary care, <2% had no corresponding ONS record. Deaths recorded in only one source were more frequent among people aged <45 years and those from Mixed, Asian or Asian British, Black or Black British, and Chinese or Other ethnic groups. ONS-only dates were also more frequent in London and the West Midlands. Primary-care-only deaths increased close to date of data extraction, reaching 7% in February 2026. Same-day GP deregistration increased from 9% in 2020 to 85% in 2025. Conclusions: Death recording in primary care EHRs showed high completeness and concordance with ONS registrations, but discrepancies remained for recent deaths and some population groups. Data recency and population-specific completeness should therefore be considered when using linked mortality data for research.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethnic variation in outcome of people hospitalised with Covid-19 in Wales (UK): A rapid analysis of surveillance data using Onomap, a name-based ethnicity classification tool 92%
- Identifying markers of health-seeking behaviour and healthcare access in UK electronic health records 92%
- Data-driven discovery of changes in clinical code usage over time: a case-study on changes in cardiovascular disease recording in two English electronic health records databases (2001-2015) 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- OpenSAFELY NHS Service Restoration Observatory 1: describing trends and variation in primary care clinical activity for 23.3 million patients in England during the first wave of COVID-19 93%
- Development and validation of a modified Cambridge Multimorbidity Score for use with internationally recognized electronic health record clinical terms (SNOMED CT) 93%
- Suspected COVID-19 in primary care: how GP records contribute to understanding differences in prevalence by ethnicity. 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using Natural Language Processing of Clinical Notes to Supplement Structured Electronic Health Record Data for Phenotyping Smoking and Obesity in a Healthcare System 91%
- A Systematic Process for Assessing Fitness-for-Purpose of Health Outcomes for Computable Phenotyping with Electronic Health Record Data 91%
- INSIGHT: A Tool for Fit-for-Purpose Evaluation and Quality Assessment of Observational Data Sources for Real World Evidence on Medicine and Vaccine Safety 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical practice guidelines and recommendations in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: systematic review and critical appraisal 88%
- Protocol for an observational study evaluating new approaches to modelling diagnostic information from large administrative hospital datasets 88%
- The use of the Registered Reports format for publication of randomized clinical trials: a cross-sectional study 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.