CaPri: Bayesian Mendelian randomization for joint estimation of causal and pleiotropic effects
Ren, O.; Zhang, W.; Lu, T.
Show abstract
Motivation: Horizontal pleiotropy remains a major challenge for Mendelian randomization (MR), particularly as increasingly large genome-wide association studies identify many genetic instruments for complex traits. Existing pleiotropy-robust methods rely on assumptions regarding the proportion or distribution of valid instruments that may be violated when pleiotropy is widespread. Results: We developed CaPri, a Bayesian MR framework that jointly estimates causal and pleiotropic effects. CaPri allows a potentially arbitrary proportion of instruments to contribute to a shared directional pleiotropic component and estimates the posterior probability and magnitude of the causal effect, instrument-specific posterior inclusion probabilities for pleiotropy, and the shared pleiotropic effect. Across simulations, CaPri maintained appropriate false positive control and accurate causal effect estimation regardless of the proportion of pleiotropic instruments, while accurately identifying pleiotropic instruments and estimating their shared effect. Performance remained robust across varying causal and pleiotropic effect sizes and exposure-outcome confounding, although sufficiently large outcome GWAS sample sizes were important for stable inference and limited prior dependence. In real data analyses, CaPri reported low posterior probabilities of causality across negative controls and strong support for established positive control relationships. Application to alcohol consumption and coronary artery disease further demonstrated its ability to identify potentially meaningful pleiotropic instruments. CaPri provides a complementary framework for strengthening causal inference and triangulation across MR methods with different identifying assumptions. Availability and implementation: CaPri is available at https://github.com/OuRen0104/CaPri.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Benchmarking Mendelian Randomization methods for causal inference using genome-wide association study summary statistics 95%
- A Bayesian approach to Mendelian randomization using summary statistics in the univariable and multivariable settings with correlated pleiotropy 94%
- A method to map and interpret pleiotropic loci using summary statistics of multiple traits 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Summary statistics from large-scale gene-environment interaction studies for re-analysis and meta-analysis 93%
- MR Corge: Sensitivity analysis of Mendelian randomization based on the core gene hypothesis for polygenic exposures 93%
- U-PASS: unified power analysis and forensics for qualitative traits in genetic association studies 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Meta-MultiSKAT: Multiple phenotype meta-analysis for region-based association test 94%
- Rare variants association testing for a binary outcome when pooling individual level data from heterogeneous studies 93%
- GxE PRS: Genotype-environment interaction in polygenic risk score models for quantitative and binary traits 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A simple approach for multiple observations improves power to detect genetic effects and genomic prediction accuracy. 95%
- Leveraging Global Genetics Resources to Enhance Polygenic Prediction Across Ancestrally Diverse Populations 92%
- Identifying and correcting for misspecifications in GWAS summary statistics and polygenic scores 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Leveraging a machine learning derived surrogate phenotype to improve power for genome-wide association studies of partially missing phenotypes in population biobanks 94%
- Reconciling S-LDSC and LDAK functional enrichment estimates 94%
- MultiSuSiE improves multi-ancestry fine-mapping in All of Us whole-genome sequencing data 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.