TrialCalibre1: An Agentic System for Trial Emulation, Benchmarking, and Calibration
Habibdoust, A.; Song, X.
Show abstract
TrialCalibre1 is an agentic system that connects clinical evidence, study design, and executable analyses. It supports reference-trial replication, direct target-trial emulation, and BenchExCal, which combines benchmarking, extension, and cal ibration sensitivity analysis. We evaluated an ASCET-based benchmark and an extension comparing clopidogrel with aspirin among adults aged 81-90 years us ing synthetic PCORnet-style claims. Two reviewers assessed benchmark extrac tion, protocol decisions, and implementation. After discussion, 53/62 and 50/62 assessable SQL checks were rated met; both reviewers rated 12/13 assessable R checks met. Protocol and proxy disagreements remained. A separate ten-question routing development set yielded 10/10 route matches and 7/7 applicable reference trial matches. The agent benchmark and extension included 6,069 and 1,602 pa tients. The extension risk ratio was 0.848 (95% CI 0.569-1.184), with a calibrated sensitivity estimate of 1.274 (0.439-3.700). The human implementation provided descriptive comparisons, not same-data validation. Dose proxies, unpopulated co variates, residual imbalance, implementation deviations, and ignored cross-cohort covariance limited interpretation. This case demonstrates a connected workflow whose protocols, code, and results can be reviewed.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A modular pipeline for natural language processing-screened human abstraction of a pragmatic trial outcome from electronic health records 94%
- Dynamic methods for ongoing assessment of site-level risk in risk-based monitoring of clinical trials: a scoping review 93%
- Design and implementation of the multi-arm, multi-stage Therapeutics for Inpatients with COVID-19 (TICO) platform master protocol: An Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines (ACTIV) initiative 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Scoping Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Clinical Trial Risk Assessment 92%
- How AI is used in FDA-authorized medical devices: a taxonomy across 1,016 authorizations 92%
- The clinician-AI interface: intended use and explainability in FDA-cleared AI devices for medical image interpretation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- INSIGHT: A Tool for Fit-for-Purpose Evaluation and Quality Assessment of Observational Data Sources for Real World Evidence on Medicine and Vaccine Safety 92%
- A Systematic Process for Assessing Fitness-for-Purpose of Health Outcomes for Computable Phenotyping with Electronic Health Record Data 89%
- Causal Forests versus Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting to adjust for Cluster-Level Confounding: A Parametric and Plasmode Simulation Study based on US Hosptial Electronic Health Record Data 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis of clinical trial registry entry histories using the novel R package cthist 95%
- Exploring scalable assessment methods for terminated trials in ClinicalTrials.gov: A cohort analysis of German and Californian trials 94%
- STIMULATE-ICP: A pragmatic, multi-centre, cluster randomised trial of an integrated care pathway with a nested, Phase III, open label, adaptive platform randomised drug trial in individuals with Long COVID: a structured protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Controlled evaLuation of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers for COVID-19 respIraTorY disease (CLARITY): Statistical analysis plan for a randomised controlled Bayesian adaptive sample size trial 92%
- Trials that turn from retrospectively registered to prospectively registered: A cohort study of ‘retroactively prospective’ clinical trial registration using history data 92%
- Supporting Reanalysis and Reuse of Clinical Trial Data: A Case Study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.