Mortality in Rural and Urban Emergency and Trauma Care in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Elbasty, A.; Sunkara, R.; Arora, M.; Un-Nisa, T.; Mohankumar, V.
Show abstract
Objective: Rural hospitals in the United States have fewer specialists, fewer critical care resources, and longer transport distances than urban hospitals, yet national studies disagree on whether rural patients are more likely to die after emergency care. The goal of this study was to determine whether short-term mortality differs between rural and urban patients receiving emergency or trauma care and to estimate the size of the difference. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis reported in line with PRISMA 2020. PubMed was searched on October 11, 2026, for studies published from 2010 onward, supplemented by web searching. Eligible studies were US observational studies that compared rural with urban patients or hospitals and reported mortality after emergency or trauma care. Odds ratios (ORs) were pooled with a DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model, with Hartung-Knapp confidence intervals (CIs) as a sensitivity analysis. Injury and trauma studies formed the primary analysis. Certainty of evidence was rated with GRADE. Results: Of 161 records identified, 14 studies were included and 12 were pooled. Across seven injury and trauma studies, rural setting was associated with higher odds of death (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.07-1.52), with substantial heterogeneity (I^2 = 84%; 95% prediction interval, 0.74-2.19). Across all 12 studies, the pooled OR was 1.23 (95% CI, 1.09-1.40; I^2 = 96%). With Hartung-Knapp intervals, the overall estimate remained significant (95% CI, 1.05-1.45) and the trauma estimate was borderline (95% CI, 0.99-1.64). Study estimates ranged from 0.65 to 1.97. Three pediatric trauma studies gave a consistent estimate (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.18-1.47; I^2 = 0%). Subgroup analyses by rurality definition, age group, and geographic scope did not explain the heterogeneity. Certainty of evidence was very low. Conclusions: In pooled US observational data, rural patients receiving emergency and trauma care had about 23% higher odds of short-term death than urban patients, most consistently among injured children. The evidence is inconsistent, rests on a single-database search with several reports assessed from abstracts only, and should be treated as preliminary. Why rural patients die more often, and at what point in the pathway from injury to definitive care, remains unanswered.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Is higher-level trauma center care associated with better outcomes in patients injured by low-energy trauma? 95%
- The association between major trauma centre care and outcomes of adult patients injured by low falls in England and Wales 93%
- Accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) in predicting need for time-critical treatment: Retrospective observational cohort study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed methods study protocol to develop and pilot a Competency Assessment Tool to support therapists in the care of patients with blunt CHest trauma (CATCh Study) 92%
- Personal protective equipment for reducing the risk of COVID-19 infection among healthcare workers involved in emergency trauma surgery during the pandemic: a systematic review protocol 92%
- Risk factors for severe outcomes of COVID-19: a rapid review 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Restrictions on top speed and nighttime usage substantially decrease the incidence of electric scooter injuries 90%
- The Impact of the “Muslim Ban” Executive Order on Healthcare Utilization in Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota 89%
- Geographic and Temporal Patterns in Covid-19 Mortality by Race and Ethnicity in the United States from March 2020 to February 2022 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.