Back

CBD use characteristics associated with perceived effects and satisfaction among CBD product users in Japan: an exploratory analysis of a cross-sectional web-based survey

Kuroda, A.; Pan, C.; Nitta, L.; Nozaki, C.

2026-10-14 public and global health
10.64898/2026.10.12.26365299 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background. Cannabidiol (CBD) products are sold in many forms for many purposes, but it is largely unknown which characteristics of real-world use relate to how users evaluate their experience. Methods. We analyzed an anonymous web-based survey of 377 CBD product users in Japan. We evaluated perceived-effect (0-5) and satisfaction (0-6) scores using main regression models of use frequency adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index. Separate supplementary models examined estimated daily CBD amount and other-cannabinoid co-use, purposes of use, or specific CBD amount-reporting status. Results. Use frequency was positively associated with perceived effects (B = 0.148, 95% CI 0.091 to 0.205) and satisfaction (B = 0.113, 95% CI 0.049 to 0.177; both p < 0.001). Estimated daily amount showed no clear association with either outcome after adjustment, whereas participants who reported specific milligram information had higher scores on both (B = 0.543, p < 0.001 and B = 0.559, p = 0.002). Amount-reporting status was associated with product form (tincture 48.5% vs 30.8%; smoking or inhalation 58.5% vs 75.7%; both FDR-adjusted p = 0.009), whereas no statistically significant group differences were found for age, sex, body mass index, use frequency, or sleep timing. Purposes of use and sleep-timing indicators showed no clear associations with the outcomes. Conclusions. Subjective evaluation of CBD use was more consistently related to how often CBD was used and whether a specific milligram amount was reported than to how much was reportedly taken, and amount-reporting status was related to product form. Specific CBD amount-reporting status may be a useful complementary dimension for characterizing real-world CBD use.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.