Mortality Among Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Ruhazwe, F. J.; Mumbere, B.; Michael, M.; Hakizimana, T.; Elna, O.
Show abstract
Objective To estimate the mortality proportion among patients with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) and to assess variation in mortality according to geographical region, study characteristics, patient populations, and mortality assessment time points. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library were searched from database inception to January 2026. Eligibility criteria Studies reporting mortality among patients with severe TBI were eligible. Severe TBI was defined as a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of [≤]8, equivalent to GCS <9 or GCS 3-8. Studies involving mixed TBI severity were included only when data for patients with severe TBI could be separately extracted. Data extraction and synthesis Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality. Mortality proportions were pooled using a random-effects model. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q and the I2 statistic. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were undertaken where sufficient data were available. Results Twenty-five studies comprising 12,829 patients with severe TBI were included in the systematic review. Across studies, 5,550 deaths were reported. Mortality proportions ranged from 17.5% to 71.1%. The pooled mortality proportion was 40.6% (95% CI 35.7% to 45.7%), with substantial heterogeneity (I2=96.8%, p<0.001). Mortality varied considerably according to geographical region and timing of outcome assessment, with higher estimates generally observed in African settings and at longer follow-up periods. Conclusion Mortality among patients with severe TBI remains substantial, with approximately two in five patients dying across the included studies. However, the very high heterogeneity indicates that the pooled estimate should not be interpreted as a universal mortality risk. Differences in healthcare resources, patient characteristics, injury severity, management practices, and mortality assessment time points may contribute to the observed variation.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Serum fibrinogen level and fibrinogen administration in patients with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol 97%
- Upregulation of interleukin-1β and interleukin-18 in traumatic brain injury patients and their potential as biomarkers 93%
- Imputation strategies for missing baseline neurological assessment covariates after traumatic brain injury: A CENTER-TBI study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy and safety of erythropoietin for traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 94%
- Efficacy and safety of tirofiban following intravenous thrombolysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 91%
- Acute ischemic Stroke in Tsutsugamushi: Understanding the Underlying Mechanisms and Risk Factors 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed methods study protocol to develop and pilot a Competency Assessment Tool to support therapists in the care of patients with blunt CHest trauma (CATCh Study) 90%
- Challenges in Synthesising the Effects of Synchronous Remote-based Interventions on Suicidal Behaviours: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 90%
- Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of TeleStroke Consultations to Support the Care of Stroke Patients Presenting to Regional Emergency Departments in Western Australia: An Economic Evaluation Case Study Protocol 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Minimally Invasive, Scalable and Reproducible Neonatal Rat Model of Severe Focal Brain Injury 91%
- White matter abnormalities characterise the acute stage of sports-related mild Traumatic Brain Injury 89%
- The wide spectrum of neuropsychiatric complications in Covid-19 patients within a multidisciplinary hospital context 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mortality and outcomes after decompressive craniectomy in children with severe traumatic brain injury 94%
- Natural Progression of Routine Laboratory Markers following Spinal Trauma: A Longitudinal, Multi-Cohort Study 92%
- Comparison of common outcome measures for assessing independence in patients diagnosed with disorders of consciousness: A Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.