Forecasting next-year change in antimicrobial resistance genes in Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii from genomic surveillance data
Adeyina, T. S.; Andre, D.; Aslam, A.; Onyedibe, K.; Idris, M.
Show abstract
Background: Surveillance tells laboratories which antimicrobial resistance genes are circulating now, but not which will change next. We built a model that forecasts, for each resistance gene and year, whether the following year brings a previously unseen allele (sequence variant), called emergence, or a change in the most common allele, called turnover. We tested it separately in Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii. Results: We used genomes annotated with AMRFinderPlus: 2,385 gene-years across 331 genes for K.pneumoniae and 1,059 across 216 for A. baumannii. To remove the effect of sequencing effort, each gene-year was sampled to 10 records and the analysis repeated 25 times. Models were trained on earlier years and tested on later ones, and on genes held out of training. On later years every model ranked genes by risk better than simple baselines in both organisms, and results for held-out genes were close. In K.pneumoniae, turnover was predicted better than emergence (best area under the ROC curve, AUROC, 0.909 versus 0.819). In A. baumannii the order reversed (emergence 0.789, turnover 0.722). The two events also relied on different features. Emergence depended mainly on how many alleles a gene had already accumulated, in both organisms. Turnover in K. pneumoniae depended mainly on how dominant the leading allele already was, and a stability index added a small gain. In A. baumannii it was spread across many weaker features. There, 56% of changes in the leading allele involved only alleles already seen, against 23% in K. pneumoniae, which may make them harder to predict. Conclusions: Changes in resistance genes can be forecast a year ahead from routine genomic surveillance data, including for genes the model has not seen. How well it works, and what it depends on, differs between organisms, so models should be built and validated for each organism, not assumed to transfer. Such models could help laboratories decide which resistance genes to monitor most closely. Keywords: antimicrobial resistance; genomic surveillance; forecasting; machine learning; allele dynamics; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Acinetobacter baumannii
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning based lineage prediction from AMR phenotypes for Escherichia coli ST131 clade C surveillance across infection types 93%
- Drug resistance prediction for Mycobacterium tuberculosis with reference graphs 93%
- Discordant bioinformatic predictions of antimicrobial resistance from whole-genome sequencing data of bacterial isolates: An inter-laboratory study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Typhi Mykrobe: fast and accurate lineage identification and antimicrobial resistance genotyping directly from sequence reads for the typhoid fever agent Salmonella Typhi 91%
- Mode and dynamics of vanA-type vancomycin-resistancedissemination in Dutch hospitals 90%
- Application of respiratory metagenomics for COVID-19 patients on the intensive care unit to inform appropriate initial antimicrobial treatment and rapid detection of nosocomial transmission 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- VAMPr: VAriant Mapping and Prediction of antibiotic resistance via explainable features and machine learning 93%
- Evaluation of parameters affecting performance and reliability of machine learning-based antibiotic susceptibility testing from whole genome sequencing data 93%
- Predicting Antimicrobial Resistance Using Conserved Genes 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of public health interventions on the future prevalence of ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae:a population based mathematical modelling study 91%
- Validating a screening agar for linezolid-resistant enterococci 89%
- Epidemiology and genomic analysis of Klebsiella oxytoca from a single hospital network in Australia 88%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.