Back

FORESEE: A prospective feasibility trial of functional precision oncology for metastatic breast cancer patients

Vaklavas, C.; Buys, S. S.; Scherer, S. D.; Kelley, K.; Zhou, L.; Yang, C.-H.; Cortes-Sanchez, E.; Butterfield, A.; Huang, X.; Moos, P. J.; Qiao, Y.; Reed, J.; Boucher, K. M.; Marth, G.; Welm, B. E.; Welm, A. L.

2026-10-12 oncology
10.64898/2026.10.10.26365226 medRxiv
Show abstract

The FORESEE trial (NCT04450706) was a prospective study to evaluate the feasibility of integrating organoid-based drug testing with comprehensive genomic characterization to inform treatment selection in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. The primary objective of the study was to determine the feasibility of providing personalized therapy recommendations using a combination of genomic vulnerability information with drug testing in patient-derived organoids (PDOs) in a clinically relevant time frame. Of the 15 patients enrolled, 10 cases had biopsies with adequate tumor content, and PDOs were successfully established in 4 of 10 cases. Drug profiling and genomic testing was completed in all established organoids, yielding an overall success rate of 40% in cases of biopsies with adequate tumor content. Drug sensitivity and genomic results were returned within 12 weeks and informed subsequent treatment selection in all evaluable cases. The primary endpoint - demonstrating that PDO-based drug screening combined with genomic characterization would identify clinically actionable outcomes in at least 46% of patients based on prior data - was not met. In conclusion, successful PDO establishment represents a limiting step in the implementation of FPO for metastatic breast cancer; however when PDO were successful, drug responses were always obtained and physicians chose to use the information in 100% of cases. These findings highlight the need for improved strategies optimizing use of patient biopsy material for drug testing in order to fully realize the clinical potential of FPO.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.