Linker stretching optimizes bonding entropy in sticker-spacer condensates
Akram, S. A.; Liu, J.; Chattaraj, A.; Gautam, S.; Chakrabarti, B.; Shakhnovich, E.; Schmit, J. D.
Show abstract
Phase separating biopolymers are often described by the sticker-spacer model, which accounts for non-attractive linkers that connect discrete attractive moieties. "Associative polymer" theories describe these systems as two coexisting fluids of stickers and spacers, respectively. In such theories the stickers and spacers are decoupled in the sense that sticker binding does not affect spacer conformations or vice versa. Informed by coarse-grained simulations, we develop a phenomenological mean-field theory to determine the microscopic coupling between the sticker and spacer degrees of freedom. Accounting for linkers connecting adjacent spacers introduces free energy contributions due to conformational entropy of the spacer and the binding combinatorics of the stickers. These contributions have opposite dependencies on spacer length because longer spacers allow a greater volume to search for binding partners but incur a greater entropy cost upon bond formation. The length dependent terms from these contributions cancel leaving a length-independent elastic term arising from the fact that a small amount of spacer stretching lowers the free energy by increasing the number of possible binding partners. The cancellation of spacer length from the theory justifies the decoupling approximation and supports mean-field treatments of heterogeneous spacers.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Model biomolecular condensates have heterogeneous structure quantitatively dependent on the interaction profile of their constituent macromolecules 97%
- A mean-field theory for predicting single polymer collapse induced by neutral crowders 95%
- Coupling of Lipid Phase Behavior and Protein Oligomerization in a Lattice Model of Raft Membranes 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.