Simple soil eDNA sampling reveals terrestrial mammal diversity in the Central Kalahari and highlights waterholes as sampling hotspots
Schenekar, T.; Bennitt, E.; Kelebileone, K.; Kotze, R.; Loveridge, A.; Mutch, E.; Ndaba, T. S.; Singh, P.
Show abstract
Remote and vast ecosystems present a challenge for biodiversity monitoring. The Central Kalahari Game Reserve in Botswana is one such ecosystem spanning 52,800 km2, a mosaic of fossilized rivers, clay pans, semi-arid sand dunes, scrub, and woodland. It is one of the last remaining untouched wildernesses in the world and hosts unique biodiversity, including populations of threatened mammals. Due to its extreme arid environment, size, and inaccessibility, surveying biodiversity across the reserve is both logistically and technically difficult. Here we demonstrate that a low-effort approach of sampling soil across the reserve is an efficient way to rapidly assess the terrestrial mammal biodiversity using eDNA metabarcoding. We found that eDNA from soil near waterholes performed better at capturing local biodiversity than soil from roads. eDNA metabarcoding detected 38 mammal species, 15 bird species and two amphibians and a simultaneously conducted camera trapping study detected 29 mammal species. eDNA was particularly powerful for detecting small-bodied taxa, including murids, mongooses and bats, which were largely missed by camera traps, while camera trapping was aimed at and performed well for detecting felids. Mammal species that had a higher activity nearby eDNA sampling points (i.e., a higher number of camera trapping recordings nearby) had a higher probability of being detected via eDNA. We propose that simple soil collection for eDNA metabarcoding, particularly close to animal congregation points such as savanna waterholes, offers a practical, scalable and cost-effective strategy for DNA-based biomonitoring in large, remote areas such those in Southern Africa.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of nanopore sequencing for increasing accessibility of eDNA studies in biodiverse countries 95%
- Environmental DNA monitoring of waterfowl reveals community changes during migration 93%
- Environmental risk factors associated with the presence of Mycobacterium ulcerans in Victoria, Australia 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- First national survey of terrestrial biodiversity using airborne eDNA 92%
- Genomic Skimming and Nanopore Sequencing Uncover Cryptic Hybridization in One of World's Most Threatened Primates 91%
- The critical role of natural history museums in advancing eDNA for biodiversity studies: a case study with Amazonian fishes 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Environmental DNA Metabarcoding Effectively Detects Invasive Species, Pests, and Community Changes in Taiwan Rice Fields 92%
- A breath of fresh air: comparative evaluation of passive versus active airborne eDNA sampling strategies 91%
- Extending Specimens to save Plant DNA: structuring Department DNA collections in times of Biodiversity loss 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fishing for mammals: landscape-level monitoring of terrestrial and semi-aquatic communities using eDNA from lotic ecosystems 92%
- A globally influential area-condition metric is a poor proxy for invertebrate biodiversity 90%
- Proving a negative; estimating species 'Confidence in Absence for Decision-Making' (CIADM) using environmental DNA monitoring 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.