Back

Common centromeric variation associates with molecular and complex traits in humans

Dong, Y.; Cutler, D.; Weinstock, J. S.

2026-10-12 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.10.09.26365154 medRxiv
Show abstract

Human centromeres harbor extensive structural variation that has remained largely inaccessible to human genetics because their repetitive -satellite arrays are absent from standard reference and imputation panels. Here we catalog 188,589 centromeric structural variants (SVs) from haplotype-resolved long-read assemblies of 196 Human Pangenome Reference Consortium individuals aligned to the telomere-to-telomere CHM13 reference. Resolving recurrent SVs into monophyletic components along centromeric haplotype phylogenies makes them imputable from pericentromeric SNPs (mean R2CV = 0.407 vs. 0.065 unresolved). In 124 individuals with haplotype-resolved nanopore methylation, we identify 418 same-chromosome SV-CpG associations that form local hypomethylation-enriched domains in the centromeric region, most strongly for deletions. We also show that a truncated 113-bp monomer on chromosome 8 is associated with the position of the CENP-A-associated centromere dip region (CDR) at n = 151, independent of array length. Imputed into 630 individuals with expression and splicing data, centromeric SVs are associated with 141 genes, 14 of them new relative to the SNP-based cis-QTL analysis, including the H3K9 methyltransferase SUV39H1. In 315,204 All of Us participants, we identify 170 associations between 61 SV predictors and 27 clinical phenotypes, including substance-related disorders and breast cancer. Our study brings a previously inaccessible class of variation into population-scale genetics and links centromeric SVs to centromere organization, gene expression, splicing and complex traits.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.