Back

Upper cervical spinal cord morphometric charts: from population references to individualized clinical assessment

Wang, J.; Hua, T.; Wu, H.; Zhang, R.; Xu, S.; Zhang, C.; Chai, L.; Yao, Y.; Gao, T.; Bai, L.; Du, X.; Zhang, C.; Lin, B.; Liao, L.; Wang, H.; Luo, Y.; Zhu, X.; Deng, D.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, Z.; Zhou, F.; Zhu, J.; Zuo, X.-N.; Cheng, S.; Xia, X.; Meng, X.; Kong, Y.-Z.; Cohen-Adad, J.; Guo, R.; Xia, S.; Duan, Y.; Zhuo, Z.; Liu, Y.; Chinese Brain Health Imaging Consortium (CHART),

2026-10-12 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.10.09.26364862 medRxiv
Show abstract

The upper cervical spinal cord is essential for motor, sensory and autonomic function, yet its normative morphometric trajectories and disease-related deviations remain unclear. Using three-dimensional T1-weighted images from 10,159 healthy individuals aged 8-85 years, we established normative references for averaged and level-specific upper cervical spinal cord morphometry, revealing measure-specific trajectories with peak ages of 29.7-44.1 years. These references were applied to 2,394 patients with seven neurological disorders: mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer' s disease, Parkinson' s disease, cerebral small vessel disease, multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease to derive individualized deviation scores. These deviation scores captured disease-specific abnormalities, enabled disease classification, and were associated with cognition, physical disability and disease progression. Finally, a personalized upper cervical spinal cord report was developed to support individualized imaging interpretation. Together, these findings provide a normative framework for quantifying upper cervical spinal cord morphometry and advancing personalized assessment across neurological disorders.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.