Random mtDNA mutagenesis maps genotype-phenotype associations across metabolic contexts and lineages
Giladi, A.; Baik, R.; Chung, C.-Y.; Kim, M.; Adams, J.; Saha, R.; Land, M.; Cui, R.; DeBitetto, E.; Kelley, M. E.; Thompson, C. B.; Reznik, E.; Sharma, R.; Challinge, R.; Isaac, S. R.; Peterson, J.; van Oudenaarden, A.; Sfeir, A.
Show abstract
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations cause inherited disease, accumulate with age, and recur in tumors, yet their effects remain unresolved because existing models interrogate one engineered allele at a time. We developed mtDIVE, a random C[->]T mutagenesis platform for pooled mitochondrial forward genetics in human epithelial cells and zebrafish embryos. mtDIVE generates genotypes ranging from single substitutions to >100 mutations per molecule, impairs respiration, and causes lineage-specific developmental delay. Coupling single-cell transcriptomics with mtDNA genotyping revealed that selection on mutant genomes and their transcriptional consequences depend on metabolic state and developmental lineage. Obligate OXPHOS eliminates highly mutated cells by apoptosis, whereas glycolytic conditions promote their competitive displacement. Individual loci exert modest but non-redundant effects that predict cell state beyond aggregate mutation burden, and cancer-recurrent variants are enriched among mutations linked to reduced mitochondrial transcription. Thus, mtDIVE links mtDNA genotypes to cellular phenotypes, separating the consequences of mutation identity from mutational load.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Comprehensive analysis of clustered mutations in cancer reveals recurrent APOBEC3 mutagenesis of ecDNA 96%
- Germline determinants of the somatic mutation landscape in 2,642 cancer genomes 96%
- A familial, telomere-to-telomere reference for human de novo mutation and recombination from a four-generation pedigree 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.