Back

Adaptive motility and feeding strategies of deep-branching predatory protists

Bouvard, J.; Girard, A.; Bentley, S. A.; Auradou, H.; Wan, K. Y.

2026-10-09 biophysics
10.64898/2026.10.08.757618 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Heterotrophic flagellates play a major role in nutrient recycling and shaping aquatic microbial communities. Many motile species have evolved diverse predatory strategies to exploit microbial prey, from bacteria to small eukaryotes. Excavates, deep-branching eukaryotic lineages with distinctive biflagellate morphology and conserved cytoskeletal features, exhibit varied feeding behaviours, including grazing, raptorial feeding, and filter-feeding. However, the temporal dynamics of their motility, feeding, and spatial distribution in relation to bacterial population density remain under-explored. Here, we quantify the behavioural ecology of excavates using high-resolution, single-cell tracking and quantitative analysis. Focussing on two Discoba species - the marine Jakoba libera and freshwater Reclinomonas americana - we identify different behavioural patterns: J. libera swims, forages and feeds, while R. americana swims and feeds. Prey availability differentially affects motility: J. libera increases the number of swimming cells when food is scarce, while R. americana shows the opposite trend. Spatial statistics reveal fundamental differences in their feeding and redistribution strategies. J. libera acts as an active forager, whereas R. americana behaves as a strict filter feeder. A third species, the anaerobic Kipferlia bialata (from a different clade), adopts a foraging strategy similar to J. libera. Together, these results elucidate the adaptive relationship between prey availability, feeding modes, and motility in bacteriovorous excavate flagellates, offering new insights into the ecological and evolutionary dynamics of microbial predators.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.