Back

Real-World Adaptation and External Validation of Machine-Learning Impedance Spectroscopy for Immediate Postpartum Detection of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries

Mlynczak, M.; Korzeniewski, K.; Rosol, M.; Uchman Musielak, M.; Barcz, E.; Grzybowska, M. E.; Sudol Szopinska, I.; Kropshofer, S.; Spinelli, A.; Borycka, K.

2026-10-11 obstetrics and gynecology
10.64898/2026.10.08.26365032 medRxiv
Show abstract

Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) requires immediate postpartum recognition for primary repair. Diagnosis relies primarily on clinical examination, as endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) is rarely a bedside option. Therefore, objective diagnostic assessment is most needed during the first postpartum hours. However, it is challenging to obtain the anatomically verified data needed to develop diagnostic technologies for this clinical window. We evaluated the translation of a machine-learning-assisted impedance spectroscopy model into its intended immediate postpartum setting. The model lifecycle comprised three sequential phases: V1 development using anatomically verified data from a prospective multicenter study (N=152); V2 real-world adaptation, comprising post-market data collection, retraining (N=144) to adapt to acute physiological tissue changes, and subsequent separate evaluation (N=125); and prospective external validation of V2 in an unseen cohort (N=70). During this separate evaluation, V2 achieved 89.6% accuracy. In external validation, all examinations occurred within 4 hours of birth (94.3% within the first hour). Against subsequent EAUS, V2 achieved 86.2% sensitivity, 92.7% specificity, and 90.0% overall accuracy. The V2 model was prospectively externally validated in its intended immediate-postpartum setting, supporting ML-assisted impedance spectroscopy as an objective adjunct, and not a replacement, to clinical OASI assessment. Further validation is required to confirm generalizability.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.