Back

Genetic Variant Burden Rises with BMI: Insights from Rare and Low-Frequency Variants in Obesity

John, S. E.; Channanath, A.; Malik, M. Z.; Al Madhoun, A.; Al-Mulla, F.; Thangavel, A. T.

2026-10-11 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.10.08.26364979 medRxiv
Show abstract

Adult obesity, including morbid obesity, has reached epidemic proportions worldwide. Yet, the current genetic models based on BMI-associated common variants identified through genome-wide association studies (GWAS) explain only a modest fraction of BMI variability. Contribution of rare and low-frequency variants to polygenic obesity remains incompletely defined. Leveraging whole-exome sequences of 1138 adults spanning normal-weight, overweight, obese and morbidly obese (MO) categories from Kuwait and Qatar, we catalogued cohort-specific rare and low-frequency deleterious variants differentiating MO individuals from normal-weight individuals. Cross-cohort comparisons identified 147 risk variants seen in [≥]2 MO individuals from one cohort and in [≥]1 MO individual from the other; among these, 27 variants occurred in [≥]2 MO individuals from each cohort. The risk genes were enriched in obesity-related pathways and tissues, with most harbouring GWAS variants associated primarily with obesity traits followed by metabolic and brain-related traits. Duodenal tissue expression data exhibited significant dysregulation of key risk genes in MO individuals. Variants from the 147-list and 27-list occurred in 87% and 49% of MO individuals, respectively; MO-variant burden correlated positively with BMI (r=0.30 and r=0.31, respectively) across the overweight-obese-MO categories. Combinations of a finite set of low-frequency coding variants substantially shape the continuum of polygenic obesity.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.