Does active travel behaviour moderate the association between the built environment and depression?
Sanders, F.; Baltramonaityte, V.; Whitmarsh, L.; Walton, E.
Show abstract
Background: Built environment characteristics have been associated with depressive symptoms, whilst active travel behaviour is linked to improved mental health. However, it remains unclear whether active travel buffers associations between increased exposure to the built environment and worse mental health. Methods: In this pre-registered study, participants were 10,310 mothers (mean age = 28.11, SD = 4.83) participating in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). A latent built environment factor was measured at study enrolment, active travel behaviour at a 2-year follow-up, and depressive symptoms at a 4-year follow-up. Moderation was examined using adjusted linear regression models including an interaction term between the built environment factor and active travel behaviour. Results: The built environment factor was positively associated with depressive symptoms ({beta} = 0.023, p = .012). Active travel behaviour was not associated with depressive symptoms ({beta} = -0.002, p = .854) and did not moderate the association between the built environment factor and depressive symptoms ({beta} = -0.002, p = .865), after adjusting for covariates, including age, familial depressive history, socioeconomic risk factors, physical activity, baseline depressive symptoms and smoking. Conclusion: Contrary to expectations, active travel behaviour does not modify associations between the built environment and depressive symptoms. These findings provide no evidence that active travel mitigates mental health risks associated with the built environment in this population.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Rural Roads to Cognitive Resilience (RRR): A prospective cohort study protocol 93%
- Neighborhood level factors and use of cigarettes, cannabis and e-cigarettes: a population-based study among Canadian adults 92%
- Does living close to petrochemical complex increase the adverse psychological effects of COVID-19 lockdown? 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Examining the associations between the food environment and dietary intake in British Columbia: A cross-sectional study 92%
- COVID-19 risk perceptions of social interaction and essential activities and inequity in the United States: Results from a nationally representative survey 92%
- Examining the intersection of child protection and public housing: development, health and justice outcomes using linked administrative data 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The interplay between air pollution, built environment, and physical activity: perceptions of children and youth in rural and urban India 93%
- Urban greenspace and anxiety symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic: A 20-month follow up of 19,848 participants in England 92%
- The association between socioeconomic status and mobility reductions in the early stage of England’s COVID-19 pandemic 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Population-level changes in the mental health of UK workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal study using Understanding Society 91%
- Survival among cancer patients after coalmine fire: Analysis of registry data in regional Victoria, Australia 91%
- Characteristics of those most vulnerable to employment changes during the Covid-19 pandemic: a nationally representative cross-sectional study in Wales 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterization of Trajectories of Physical Activity and Cigarette Smoking from Early Adolescence to Adulthood 92%
- Physical Activity Behaviour in Middle-Aged and Older Canadian Women and Men: An Analysis of the CLSA 92%
- InterMob: A 24-month randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of an intervention including behavioural change techniques and free transport versus an intervention including air pollution awareness-raising on car use reduction among regular car users living in Grenoble, France 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.