Back

JEPA-SORT: World-Model Embeddings Improve Deep-Sea Multi-Object Tracking on Visually Homogeneous Fauna

Tillinghast-Raby, A.; Kravetz, M.; Kamau-Weng, J.; Weinnig, A.; Rodrigues, Y.; Varini, F.; Pieribone, V.

2026-10-09 ecology
10.64898/2026.10.07.757484 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Protecting deep-sea sessile communities as Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) requires accurate estimates of their spatial distribution and abundance. Existing computer-vision detection methods require careful calibration to avoid counting errors; multi-object tracking (MOT) theoretically offers a more robust alternative. In practice, however, poor lighting and turbidity limit the efficacy of purely kinematic MOT algorithms in deep-sea environments. At the same time, the intra-species visual homogeneity typical of deep-sea scenes means traditional per-frame appearance features are often too weak to maintain stable identities in deep-association MOT algorithms. In this paper we introduce JEPA-SORT, an MOT algorithm that injects V-JEPA 2.1 embeddings into detection-to-track association, to show that video world-model embeddings - which capture not only physical appearance but spatiotemporal trajectory across viewpoints - can help maintain stable identities on visually homogeneous specimens. We provide a benchmark of twelve ROV transects surveying deep-sea sessile communities and evaluate JEPA-SORT against standard MOT algorithms across a range of simulated optical environments. We also propose the Biodensity Utility Metric (BDU), which measures tracker performance in the context of downstream ecological modeling. JEPA-SORT outperforms all benchmarked trackers on IDF1, MOTA, and BDU and is competitive on specimen-count accuracy. Ablations indicate its advantage stems primarily from the discriminative power of world-model embeddings on visually homogeneous footage.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.