Back

Efficient detection of cryptic pockets on challenging drug targets using MD-free co-vibrational modes

Szalai, T. V.; Bajusz, D.; Orgovan, Z.; Abranyi-Balogh, P.; Gadanecz, M.; Imre, T.; Grant, E. K.; Bush, J. T.; Kolossvary, I.; Keserü, G. M.

2026-10-08 biophysics
10.64898/2026.10.07.757394 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Allosteric and cryptic binding sites provide unique opportunities in drug discovery for achieving selectivity, reducing toxicity and unlocking challenging therapeutical targets. Yet, cryptic pockets are particularly elusive in that they are difficult to capture with experimental methodologies, and therefore often remain undetected. Computational approaches for flexible cryptic site detection traditionally involve extensive unbiased molecular dynamics simulations, or more efficient but computationally still highly demanding biased MD alternatives that make use of enhanced sampling along low-frequency motions of the protein structure. Here we utilize a new variant of the recently introduced and orders of magnitude faster, MD-free COVIB algorithm to identify cryptic pockets efficiently in two challenging targets, the KRAS oncoprotein and the N-terminal domain of the STAT5B transcription factor. Using experimental and AI-modelled structures, respectively, we identify numerous cryptic sites, some of which have not yet been reported. The sites are prioritized and validated with our pharmacophore optimized photoaffinity-tagged fragment library via MS-based peptide mapping and NMR spectroscopy. Besides identifying new, targetable regions on the surface of these important oncotargets, we have established a protocol combining COVIB-based cryptic pocket detection and photoaffinity-based experimental peptide mapping as a robust approach for exploring unique and tractable cryptic pockets.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.