Back

Reconciling intrinsic and ecosystem water-use efficiency reveals physiological mechanisms underlying carbon-water coupling across biological scales

Puchi, P. F.; Dalmonech, D.; Castagneri, D.; Vangi, E.; Lehmann, M. H.; Saurer, M.; Klesse, S.; Hortnagl, L.; Collalti, A.

2026-10-08 ecology
10.64898/2026.10.07.757244 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding how carbon-water coupling scales from leaves to ecosystems remains a major challenge because water-use efficiency (WUE) metrics integrate physiological, hydrological, and ecological processes. We integrated tree-ring width, triple stable isotopes ({delta}13C, {delta}18O and {delta}2H), eddy covariance (EC) observations, and a process-based model to investigate the drivers of intrinsic (iWUE) and ecosystem water-use efficiency (WUEeco) across biological scales in a mature Fagus sylvatica forest between 2004 and 2023. Modelled and isotope-derived iWUE were strongly correlated (r = 0.61, p < 0.05) and both indicated an approximately 20% long-term increase, consistent with increasing gross primary productivity. In contrast, WUEeco derived from EC was lower than model estimates and exhibited a positive trend not reproduced by the model. This divergence primarily reflected differences in biological representation and hydrological integration, as the single-species model underestimated ecosystem evapotranspiration by excluding co-occurring deciduous and evergreen species together with understory vegetation. Triple-isotope analyses showed that the long-term increase in iWUE was driven by enhanced photosynthetic assimilation rather than sustained stomatal closure, whereas {delta}18O and {delta}2H variability was mainly controlled by source-water dynamics. These findings provide a mechanistic framework for reconciling leaf- and ecosystem-scale WUE and improving predictions of forest carbon-water coupling under climate change.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.