Natural isolates of Sinorhizobium meliloti with dry, as opposed to mucoid, colony morphologies have higher soil fitness, slightly lower host fitness, and reduced nitrogen fixation
GIL POLO, M. A.; Guha, S.; Chancey, D.; Clouse, K.; Siva, N.; Anderson, C. T.; Burghardt, L. T.
Show abstract
Sinorhizobium meliloti is a nitrogen-fixing soil bacterium that forms a facultative mutualism with its host alfalfa. S. meliloti strains exhibit diverse colony morphologies on solid culture media that span a continuum from dry to mucoid. Studies on how this trait affects symbiosis rely on mutations in exopolysaccharide II production genes; however, whether natural variation in morphology confers a selective advantage on rhizobia in their natural habitats remains unknown. Here, we used 90 mucoid and 27 dry natural isolates to test whether colony morphology is associated with rhizobial fitness in the soil and in the host, or with the nitrogen-fixation benefits they provide to the plant. Colony morphologies were widely distributed across a phylogenetic tree, suggesting that morphological shifts occurred repeatedly and no single genetic variant was strongly associated with this trait. We inoculated soil mesocosms and plants with a mixture of dry and mucoid bacteria. We observed that dry rhizobia have higher fitness, particularly at 22{degrees}C and 32{degrees}C, but not under cold or drought conditions, independent of the initial rhizobial load. Conversely, mucoid bacteria have a modestly higher relative fitness in host nodules, and single inoculations showed that they tend to confer greater benefits to all three alfalfa varieties. Over time, we also observed rare, repeated conversion from mucoid to dry morphologies in soil and host plants. Taken together, our study reveals that morphological variation within a species in a single agricultural field is important for bacterial fitness in the soil and can have cascading effects on the rhizobia's plant benefits.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Rhizobium leguminosarum symbiovar viciae strains are natural wheat endophytes and can stimulate root development and colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi 92%
- Adaptation of Plasmid-ID Technology for Evaluation of N2-Fixing Effectiveness and Competitiveness for Root Nodulation in the Sinorhizobium-Medicago System 92%
- Trait-based approach to bacterial growth efficiency 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Soybean Root Nodule Occupancy: Competition Between Bradyrhizobium and Sinorhizobium Strains Inoculated at Different Plant Growth Stages 93%
- Prevalence and correlates of phenazine resistance in culturable bacteria from a dryland wheat field 92%
- Soil chemistry and soil history significantly structure oomycete communities in Brassicaceae crop rotations 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rhizobia independently adapt to soil and legume host environments, but soil conditions influence the abundance of high-quality partners. 97%
- Commensal Pseudomonas fluorescens protect Arabidopsis from closely-related Pseudomonas pathogens in a colonization-dependent manner 93%
- Horizontal gene transfer to a defensive symbiont with a reduced genome amongst a multipartite beetle microbiome 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A dual sequence and culture-based survey of maize rhizosphere protists reveals dominant,plant-enriched, and culturable community members 92%
- Isolation of a novel plant growth-promoting Dyella sp. from a Danish natural soil 92%
- Association of E. coli Nissle with insect-parasitic nematode Steinernema hermaphroditum 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A suite of rare microbes interacts with a dominant, heritable, fungal endophyte to influence plant trait expression 92%
- In vitro biofilm formation only partially predicts beneficial Pseudomonas fluorescens protection against rhizosphere pathogens 92%
- Defined synthetic microbial communities colonize and benefit field-grown sorghum 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.