Back

A three-dimensional imaging pipeline for the detection of vasculogenic mimicry in mouse tumor models

Deighton, L.; Pearsall, S. M.; Qosaj, F.; Mitchell, M.; Awanis, G.; IMAXT Cancer Grand Challenge Consortium, ; Bressan, D.; Dive, C.; Simpson, K. L.; Hannon, G. J.; Caldas, C.; Sawicka, K.; Cannell, I. G.

2026-10-09 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.10.07.756703 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Vasculogenic mimicry (VM) describes the ability for tumor cells to mimic endothelial cells and form tumor-lined blood vessels. Although VM is associated with poor prognosis, resistance to therapeutics and metastasis, its presence, relevance and functionality have been debated, largely due to the techniques employed to determine its presence. Dual CD31 and periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) histological staining, the method widely used to detect VM within tumor tissue, is hampered by issues with artifacts of 2D sections and does not assess active blood flow through vessels and hence cannot confirm vessel functionality. Here, we present a 3D imaging pipeline to detect functionally perfused VM and host vessels within mouse tumor models. Mice tumor models are intravenously injected with fluorescently-labelled tomato lectin which binds to the lumen of functional blood vessels. These tumors are thickly sliced, optically-cleared, stained with endothelial markers and imaged using light-sheet microscopy. We apply this imaging modality to image tumors from six breast cancer patient-derived tissue xenograft models, an orthotopic mammary cancer model and two small cell lung cancer circulating-tumor cell explant models, where VM vessels, mosaic vessels and host-VM vessel junctions can be detected. To our knowledge, this is the largest collection of 3D VM vessel images to date, providing convincing evidence of the presence and functionality of VM within tumors and defining the level of evidence necessary to detect VM in vivo.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.