Perturbation of the replication stress-ATR axis accelerates human erythroid differentiation but blocks terminal maturation
Jauregui-Lozano, J.; Kremer, A.; Prummel, K. D.; Zaugg, J. B.
Show abstract
Replication stress (RS) can act as an input to differentiation: in erythroid and myeloid cells it is sufficient to accelerate commitment. Yet genotoxic chemotherapy, which imposes replication stress on the bone marrow can cause anemia; a frequent dose-limiting toxicity whose deficit of mature red cells is often attributed to progenitor depletion rather than to any effect on differentiation itself. Here, we ask how RS-induced accelerated commitment gives rise to impaired red cell output, using in vitro erythroid differentiation of cord-blood CD34+ progenitors perturbed with clinically relevant chemotherapy agents. We find that treated erythroblasts differentiate faster than controls but fail to mature, measured by lack of enucleated cells. Inhibition of ATR, but not ATM or DNA-PK, reproduces this phenotype. Mechanistically, single-cell profiling of drug-treated cells shows convergence on a transcriptional program, marked by loss of MYB and MYC activity. Treated cultures also accumulate aberrant late erythroblasts depleted for globin and heme programs and enriched for p53 and proteotoxic stress signatures. Together, these results propose that defective maturation is an alternative mechanism for chemotherapy-induced anemia, in addition to depletion of progenitors.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome-wide CRISPR Screens Identify Ferroptosis as a Novel Therapeutic Vulnerability in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia 92%
- Aberrant MNX1 Expression Associated with t(7;12)(q36;p13) Pediatric Acute Myeloid 1 Leukemia Induces the Disease Through Altering Histone Methylation 92%
- ANKRD26 is a new regulator of type I cytokine receptor signaling in normal and pathological hematopoiesis 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.