Life-course patterns of heavy menstrual bleeding and menstrual pain across multiple population-based cohorts
Kundu, S.; Sawyer, G.; Magnus, M. C.; Howe, L. D.; Fraser, A.; Hickey, M.; O'Mahen, H.; Tyrrell, J.; Maybin, J. A.; Critchley, H.; Barrington, D. J.; Sharp, G. C.
Show abstract
Background: Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) and menstrual pain (MP) are among the most common menstrual cycle related symptoms with substantial impacts on quality of life. Despite this, population-level evidence on their prevalence across the life course is scarce. Methods: We conducted descriptive analyses of six longitudinal population-based cohorts from the United Kingdom, United States, Norway, and Australia. We estimated cumulative prevalence (across all available timepoints) and age-specific point prevalence of HMB and MP. Cumulative prevalence estimates were stratified by sociodemographic factors, where data permitted. We also examined HMB and MP incidence in adolescent cohorts with repeated measurements. Findings: HMB and MP are commonly reported, with cumulative prevalence across all the cohorts and timepoints (i.e., ever reported) ranging from 36% to 89% for HMB and 46% to 72% for MP. In adolescence, MP (point-prevalence: 33% to 47%) is more commonly reported than HMB (16% to 24%), whereas in later ages (45 years and above), HMB (47% to 70%) is more prevalent than MP (24% to 40%). We found no consistent evidence that symptoms were more likely to co-occur than occur independently; patterns varied across life stages and cohorts. Symptoms were more common in those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds and minoritised ethnic groups. Incidence of both HMP and MP peaked in the years immediately following menarche. Interpretation: Most women experience heavy and/or painful periods at some point. MP is more common in adolescence and HMB in later reproductive life. Generating robust life-course evidence on menstrual symptom patterns is essential to inform clinical guidelines, reduce diagnostic delays, and address inequalities in menstrual health.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Measurement of changes to the menstrual cycle: A transdisciplinary systematic review evaluating measure quality and utility for clinical trials 95%
- Assessing the relationship between menstrual products and reproductive and urogenital tract infections (RUTIs): a systematic review evaluating the evidence and recommendations for future research 94%
- Short-term outcomes of pubertal suppression in a selected cohort of 12 to 15 year old young people with persistent gender dysphoria in the UK 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evidence for treatment with estradiol for women with SARS-CoV-2 infection 91%
- Deep Immunophenotyping Reveals Endometriosis is Marked by Dysregulation of the Mononuclear Phagocytic System in Endometrium and Peripheral Blood 91%
- Establishing the relationships between adiposity and reproductive factors: a multivariable Mendelian randomization analysis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The relationship between maternal psychopathology and offspring incontinence and constipation at school age: a prospective cohort study 91%
- Comorbidity of self-harm and disordered eating in young people: Evidence from a UK population-based cohort 90%
- Antidepressant and mental health care utilization in pregnant women with depression and/or anxiety: an interrupted time-series analysis 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ovarian follicular function is not altered by SARS-Cov-2 infection or BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccination 91%
- Stratifying IVF population endometria using a prognosis gradient independent of endometrial timing. 91%
- Impaired glucose tolerance and cardiovascular risk factors in relation to infertility: a Mendelian randomization analysis in the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.