Doctors experiences of interruptions in UK secondary care outpatient clinics: a cross-sectional survey of prevalence, consequences and management strategies
Boustani, S.; Staras, C.; Rich, A.; Griffin, A.
Show abstract
Objectives To examine the prevalence of interruptions during UK secondary care outpatient consultations, their association with clinician mental workload, and the strategies clinicians use to manage them. Design Nationwide cross-sectional online survey. Setting Secondary care outpatient clinics, United Kingdom. Participants A sample of 465 UK secondary care doctors across a range of grades and specialties, recruited through a medical defence organisation's network. Primary and secondary outcome measures Mental workload (NASA Task Load Index, Raw-TLX); interruption frequency; perceived cognitive impact of interruptions; task resumption difficulty; perceived social effects on colleague interactions and team cohesion; and interruption-management strategy use. Results 61.1% of clinicians reported being interrupted often or very often, and mean overall workload was high (Raw-TLX 66.2, SD 11.5). Interruption frequency, patient complexity and perceived cognitive impact were each associated with higher workload across multiple NASA-TLX subscales. In fully adjusted models, interruption frequency retained independent associations with overall workload (beta = 1.79, p = 0.004) and temporal demand (beta = 0.94, p < 0.001). Task resumption difficulty was associated with worse perceived performance (beta = -0.59, p = 0.014), while perceiving interruptions as socially positive was associated with better performance (beta = 0.75, p = 0.003) and lower frustration (beta = -1.16, p < 0.001). Years of experience showed only small effects, and self-reported strategy use (38.7%) was not consistently associated with lower workload. Exploratory natural language processing of open-text descriptions identified three strategy clusters; cognitive offloading, anticipating and preparing, and blunt responses, with distinct emotional profiles. Conclusions Interruptions were commonly reported during UK secondary care outpatient consultations and were associated with measurable cognitive and temporal burden. The perceived social framing of interruptions was independently associated with frustration and self-rated performance. Binary strategy use showed no consistent workload association, indicating a need for system-level approaches addressing interruption frequency, task resumption support and the social context of interruptions rather than reliance on individual coping.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Balancing Act of Academic Clinical Fellows in UK Emergency Medicine: A Qualitative Study 92%
- Adherence to protective measures among health care workers in the UK; a cross-sectional study 89%
- High use of the emergency department shows typical features of complex systems: analysis of multicentre linked data 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- The use and impact of surveillance-based technology initiatives in inpatient and acute mental health settings: A systematic review 90%
- The effectiveness, implementation, and experiences of peer support approaches for mental health: a systematic umbrella review 88%
- Optimizing COVID-19 surveillance in long-term care facilities: a modelling study 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- AI-Simulated Clinical Consultations: Assessing the Potential of ChatGPT to Support Medical Training 90%
- ‘Admissions to paediatric medical wards with a primary mental health diagnosis: a systematic review of the literature’ 87%
- Deficits in planned hospital care for vulnerable adolescents in England during the COVID-19 pandemic: analysis of linked administrative data 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adverse event reviews in healthcare: What matters to patients and their family? A qualitative study exploring the perspective of patients and family 92%
- Safe clinical practice for patients hospitalised in mental health wards during a suicidal crisis: a qualitative study of patient experiences 92%
- The psychosocial impact on frontline health and social care professionals in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Feasibility trial of a new digital training package to enhance primary care practitioners' communication of clinical empathy and realistic optimism 93%
- Capturing the experiences of UK healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural topic modelling analysis of 7,412 free-text survey responses 92%
- Physiotherapy Under Pressure: A Cross-Sectional Study on The Interplay Between Perfectionism, Moral Injury, and Burnout 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.