Back

Corazonin links social role and metabolic-stress responses in honey bee workers

Scofield, S. L.; Amdam, G. V.

2026-10-07 zoology
10.64898/2026.10.06.757184 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Corazonin is implicated in regulating diverse behavioral and physiological responses in insects, yet its role in honey bees remains unclear. Work in social and non-social species suggests an ancestral function for corazonin as a metabolic stress signal and a derived function as a pro-foraging signal in social insects. To investigate this hypothesis, we examined corazonin signaling across worker roles and metabolic states and tested its regulatory relationships with pathways central to worker division of labor. Central corazonin levels (both transcript and peptide) were approximately threefold higher in foragers than in nurses. Acute metabolic challenge did not alter brain corazonin but strongly upregulated fat body corazonin receptor (CrzR) transcript in nurses only, suggesting role-specific induction of peripheral sensitivity to corazonin signaling. Injection of synthetic corazonin decreased fat body insulin receptor substrate transcript, while transcripts of vitellogenin (Vg), unpaired-like A, ecdysone receptor B, and Cyp314a1 were unaffected. Measures of gustatory responsiveness, starvation resistance, and hemolymph sugar levels were similarly unaffected by corazonin injection. Reducing Vg through RNA interference in nurse-age bees did not affect CrzR transcript levels, despite vitellogenin's established roles in stress buffering, antioxidant defense, and lifespan. This contrast highlights the specificity of CrzR upregulation in nurses as a response to metabolic challenge rather than general stress. Together, these findings support corazonin as a co-opted nutritional signal that helps shape the forager physiological state, suggesting that it may act in part through interactions with insulin signaling rather than directly regulating classical nutritional or stress-response pathways.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.