Back

Exitron-type splicing of intrinsically disordered regions recurs across jawed vertebrates despite sequence divergence: donor-proximal cis control in TARDBP

Yamagishi, T.; Koide, S.; Toyama, G.; Washida, A.; Okawara, S.; Yoshida, K.; Onodera, O.; Sugai, A.

2026-10-06 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.10.06.756961 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) mediate molecular interactions but can also promote aberrant self-association. Using donors embedded within IDR-coding sequences, exitron-type splicing can remove these sequences, giving them both protein-coding and splice-regulatory roles. Yet IDR amino-acid sequences often diverge rapidly, raising the question of whether and how their coding sequences support IDR-removing splicing across species. Using RNA-seq data from jawed vertebrates, we identified events predicted to remove most of an IDR while preserving annotated structured regions. Across species, donor-flanking nucleotide identity exceeded expectations from synonymous alternatives encoding the same amino-acid sequence. TARDBP, which encodes TDP-43, provided a model for examining how coding sequences both encode IDRs and regulate exitron-type splicing. Sequence-divergent vertebrate TARDBP terminal regions supported this splicing in human cells. In teleosts, TARDBP ohnologs (tardbpa and tardbpb) encoded compositionally similar disordered tails but differed markedly in IDR-removing exitron-type splicing. Reciprocal donor-proximal substitutions in zebrafish minigenes redirected donor choice and altered the balance between IDR-retaining and IDR-removing transcripts. In corresponding reporters, these substitutions altered protein-product balance and cytoplasmic puncta formation. These findings show that IDR-removing exitron-type splicing can recur despite sequence divergence and that donor-proximal TARDBP sequences both encode IDR segments and regulate IDR inclusion, linking RNA processing to protein behavior.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.