Back

Pseudocryptic diversity within the Phakellia robusta species complex: description of Phakellia pallida sp. nov. and Phakellia pusilla sp. nov.

Gracia-Sancha, C.; Taboada, S.; De la Torriente, A.; Galia-Camps, C.; Gonzalez-Porto, M.; Rios, P.; Cristobo, J.; Serrano, A.; Massuti, E.; Riesgo, A.; Diaz, J. A.

2026-10-07 zoology
10.64898/2026.10.06.756958 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The genus Phakellia comprises predominantly fan-shaped deep-sea sponges, but its species diversity and boundaries remain unresolved. Here, we use an integrative approach combining morphological and molecular data to investigate the Phakellia robusta species complex and describe two new species, Phakellia pallida sp. nov. and Phakellia pusilla sp. nov. Overlap in external and spicular morphology makes these taxa challenging to identify. Molecular analyses based on mitochondrial (cox1) and nuclear (28S) markers support the recognition of the three taxa as distinct species, and reveal their close evolutionary relationship. The two new species co-occur in the NE Atlantic Ocean and the Mediterranean Sea, with overlapping depth ranges, although P. pallida sp. nov. is generally found at greater depths. Our results also suggest that several previous records of P. robusta from the Mediterranean and southern parts of the NE Atlantic may instead correspond to either P. pallida sp. nov. or P. pusilla sp. nov., indicating that its distribution requires reassessment. In addition, a group I intron previously reported in the cox1 gene of P. robusta was polymorphically detected at the same insertion site in some, but not all, individuals of P. pusilla sp. nov., but it was absent from P. pallida sp. nov. individuals. Overall, our results reveal pseudocryptic diversity within Phakellia and highlight the value of integrative approaches for resolving species boundaries and reassessing deep-sea sponge diversity and distributions.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.