Proteomes reflect size-based growth constraints across diverse microbes
McCain, J. S. P.; Miettinen, T. P.; Braakman, R.; Follows, M. J.
Show abstract
The maximum growth rate of microbes plays a central role in shaping ecological outcomes and is a major target of bioengineering efforts. Previous data compilations suggest single cell maximum growth rates mostly decrease with cell volume across species, except for an initial increase from the very smallest microbes to an intermediate size. Here we hypothesized that this unimodal relationship is shaped by the volumetric requirements of ribosomes and the surface area-dependence of nutrient supply. We developed a mechanistic model relating ribosomal protein mass fraction to growth rate and cell size. Predictions from this model were empirically supported by proteomic data from 97 prokaryotes ranging over 3 orders of magnitude in cell volume. Our analysis suggests that the smallest cells' growth rates are restricted by the volumetric constraints on ribosomes per cell and rely on compact, heterotrophic metabolisms. In contrast, growth rates of the largest prokaryotes face geometric constraints on specific resource acquisition rates, capping growth rates and investment in ribosomal protein, but allowing investment in protein-expensive metabolisms including phototrophy and sulfur oxidation. Prokaryotic cells of intermediate size face neither constraint and exhibit a higher maximum growth rate potential, which, we hypothesize, is associated with elevated metabolic diversity.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Finding CRISPR’s Niche: Oxygen and Temperature Shape the Incidence of Adaptive Immunity 93%
- Horizontally transmitted symbiont populations in deep-sea mussels are genetically isolated 92%
- Evolution in action: Habitat-transition leads to genome-streamlining in Methylophilaceae (Betaproteobacteriales) 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.