AI-Based Screening Approach for Primary Aldosteronism Using Longitudinal Electronic Health Records
Lee, F. G.; Choudhary, A.; Li-Han, L. Y.; Varghese, C.; Larson, E. L.; Perry, W. R. G.; Bancos, I.; Foster, T. R.; McKenzie, T. J.; Salehinejad, H.; Thiels, C. A.
Show abstract
Context Current guidelines for primary aldosteronism (PA) recommend screening all patients with hypertension. Given low screening rates, an automated artificial intelligence (AI)-based risk-stratified approach may facilitate guideline implementation. Objective To develop an AI-based prescreening tool using electronic health record (EHR) data to identify at-risk patients. Design Model development retrospective cohort study. Ensemble architecture using eXtreme Gradient Boosting, random forest, and extremely randomized trees was trained on EHR data (1986-2025) and evaluated on a test set of patients with hypertension. Setting Single institution system spanning community clinics and tertiary/quaternary centers reported via Mayo Clinic Platform. Patients Adults with hypertension, International Classification of Disease (ICD) diagnosis of PA, or had plasma renin/aldosterone testing. Main Outcome Measures Predicting PA diagnosis (disease) or negative workup (control) using age, sex, ICD diagnoses, vitals, labs, and medications by area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC), estimated calibration error (ECE), and specificity. Results Of 22,264 patients (1,833 disease and 20,431 controls), median time from initial encounter to screening was 5.0 years (IQR 0.5-12.6). The model demonstrated AUROC 0.709 (95% CI 0.688-0.730) with ECE 0.037. At a 0.5 cut-off threshold, the model had high specificity (71.6%) and low false positivity (28.4%). In a test cohort of 1,279,455 adults with hypertension, the model identified 5,295 (0.4%) for first-pass screening. Conclusions A high-specificity model can provide a pre-screening PA pathway using routine EHR data to identify and prioritize patients for PA screening. This AI-based approach can risk-stratify patients, guide sequencing of testing/referrals, and pragmatically facilitate adoption of current guidelines into practice.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Hypertension Management Dynamics in Pediatric CKD: Insights from the 4C Study 93%
- Trends in Awareness, Antihypertensive Medication Use and Blood Pressure Control by Race and Ethnicity Among Adults with Hypertension in the United States: A National Health and Nutrition Examination Analysis from 2011 to 2018 92%
- Projected Impact of Nonpharmacologic Management of Stage 1 Hypertension Among Lower-Risk US Adults 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating Heritability of Glycaemic Response to Metformin using Nationwide Electronic Health Records and Population-Sized Pedigree 89%
- Precision Prognostics for Cardiovascular Disease in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 87%
- Achieving Inclusive Healthcare through Integrating Education and Research with AI and Personalized Curricula 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Causal modeling of chronic kidney disease in a participatory framework for informing the inclusion of social drivers in health algorithms 91%
- Learning Decision Thresholds for Risk-Stratification Models from Aggregate Clinician Behavior 91%
- Personalizing renal replacement therapy initiation in the intensive care unit: a reinforcement learning-based strategy with external validation on the AKIKI randomized controlled trials 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- AI Learning for Pediatric Right Ventricular Assessment: Development and Validation Across Multiple Centers 90%
- GLUCOSE: A Distributional Reinforcement Learning Model for Optimal Glucose Control After Cardiac Surgery 89%
- Response to Polygenic Risk: Results of the MyGeneRank Mobile Application-Based Coronary Artery Disease Study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.