US-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma in Non-Screening Settings: Diagnostic Errors and Mitigation Strategies
EL HAG, I.; Al Shammary, M. T.; Tallab, R.; Patil, S.; Alghamdi, A.
Show abstract
Background: Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC, equal to or smaller than 1 cm) is increasingly diagnosed, and a subset behaves aggressively. Preoperative ultrasound (US) and fine needle aspiration (FNA) accuracy in this size range, particularly with multinodular disease, is poorly defined outside East Asian screening cohorts. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 180 consecutive PTMC cases (2017 to 2026) with preoperative US and FNA and compared them with 191 benign thyroidectomy controls. ROC analysis identified an optimal size cutoff. We compared sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy across tumor-size subgroups, before/after 2023, and with/without dominant nodules (DNs) equal to or larger than 2 cm. Results: ROC analysis identified 5 mm as the optimal cutoff (AUC 0.80). FNA sensitivity was 44.4% overall, falling to 14.1% for tumors <5 mm versus 61.2% for [≥]5 mm, with specificity uniformly high (94.8%). US showed a similar pattern (sensitivity 23.4% vs. 64.7%) but lower specificity (69.6%), driven largely by calcification and Hashimoto's-related hypoechogenicity. Combined FNA+US improved sensitivity to 59.4%. DNs equal to or larger than 2 cm markedly reduced FNA true-positive rates (67.9% vs. 10.8%; OR 17.4). Excluding DN cases raised FNA sensitivity to 67%, NPV to 84.2%, and accuracy to 85.2%. Post-2023 experience significantly improved all metrics (sensitivity 34.4% to 54.4%). Conclusion: FNA and US sensitivity for PTMC decline sharply below 5 mm and in multinodular glands with dominant nodules, while specificity/PPV remain high. A 5 mm threshold, operator experience, and selective avoidance of FNA in dominant-nodule bearing multinodular goiters (favoring direct surgical referral) can meaningfully improve diagnostic performance and guide management.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Thyroid dysfunction diagnosis from routine laboratory tests based on machine learning 89%
- A Genes & Health pilot recall study of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and cholestatic liver disease 83%
- Cancer risk algorithms in primary care: can they improve risk estimates and referral decisions? 83%
Similar papers in this journal
- Expression based biomarkers and models to classify early and late stage samples of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma 90%
- The Role of Carbon Nanoparticle in Lymph Node Detection and Parathyroid Gland Protection during Thyroidectomy - a Meta Analysis 88%
- Classification performance bias between training and test sets in a limited mammography dataset 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Content-based image retrieval assists radiologists in diagnosing eye and orbital mass lesions in MRI 89%
- Multi-center Clinical Study Using Optical Coherence Tomography for Evaluation of Cervical Lesions In-vivo 86%
- MyoVision-US: an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Software for Automated Analysis of Skeletal Muscle Ultrasonography 85%
Similar papers in this journal
- Accurate diagnosis of high-risk pulmonary nodules using a non-invasive epigenetic biomarker test 88%
- Multiple ETS Factors Participate in the Transcriptional Control of TERT Mutant Promoter in Thyroid Cancers 86%
- Recombinant Human TSH Fails to Induce the Proliferation and Migration of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Cell Lines 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prognostic Analysis of Histopathological Images Using Pre-Trained Convolutional Neural Networks 84%
- EsoDetect: Computational Validation and Algorithm Development of a Novel Diagnostic and Prognostic Tool for Dysplasia in Barrett’s Esophagus 81%
- DNMT family induced down-regulation of NDRG1 via DNA methylation and clinicopathological significance in gastric cancer 81%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.