Back

Psychiatric comorbidity in dissociative identity disorder: A meta-analysis

Mitchell, E.; Kazi, A.; Watson, A.; Pick, S.; Terhune, D. B.

2026-10-07 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.10.06.26364737 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Dissociative identity disorder (DID) is associated with frequent psychiatric comorbidity. Its complex and overlapping symptom profile can complicate recognition of both DID and co-occurring psychiatric conditions, contributing to diagnostic uncertainty. Evidence regarding psychiatric comorbidity is limited and prevalence estimates vary across studies. Aims: This meta-analysis aimed to examine the prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities in DID and factors associated with variation in prevalence estimates. Methods: Eligible studies were identified through PubMed, Scopus, Embase, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE from 1980 to 25 April 2026 (PROSPERO, no. CRD420261335819). Studies reporting psychiatric comorbidity in adults with DID were independently screened by two reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed. Random-effects meta-analyses using logit-transformed prevalence estimates were conducted. Meta-regressions examined moderators, whilst influence and sensitivity analyses assessed robustness. Certainty was evaluated using the GRADE approach. Results: Twenty-four studies (N = 858) contributed to the meta-analysis across 23 psychiatric comorbidities. Among individuals with DID, posttraumatic stress disorder had the highest pooled prevalence (87.44%, 95% CI 71.79-94.96), followed by major depressive disorder (62.64%, 95% CI 33.45-84.84), and borderline personality disorder (47.05%, 95% CI 34.21-60.32). Substantial heterogeneity was noted across most estimates. Meta-regressions identified significant associations with participant characteristics, recruitment, study quality, and diagnostic method. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were heterogenous. Conclusions: Psychiatric comorbidity in DID is substantial and spans multiple diagnostic categories, although considerable heterogeneity and methodological variation limit confidence in prevalence estimates. Standardised diagnostic assessment, more representative sampling, and longitudinal research are needed to clarify the extent and clinical significance of comorbidity in DID.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.