Back

Filling the Missing Puzzle: Integrating Interaction and Evolutionary Information to Enhance Protein Fitness Prediction in Inverse Folding

Wang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, Y.; Qu, Y.; Mu, Y.; Wang, S.; Han, N.; Zheng, L.; Li, W.

2026-10-11 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.10.05.756918 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Protein inverse folding, which infers compatible amino acid sequences from a given backbone structure, is central to rational protein design. Current methods rely largely on sequence recovery rate as the evaluation metric, emphasizing structural compatibility but seldom addressing function. Yet functional activity depends on the proper network of non-covalent interactions-protein-ligand contacts being a prime example. We argue that function-oriented protein design is governed by three complementary constraints: structural, interaction, and evolutionary, none of which are handled in a unified manner by existing pretrained models. To bridge this gap, we introduce zPolaron, a graph neural network built on protein-ligand complexes for functional protein design. zPolaron represents residues and ligand atoms as a heterogeneous graph and jointly encodes structural, interaction, and evolutionary information by fusing physical-interaction-enhanced graph representations with ESM-2 embeddings. Across multiple fitness prediction benchmarks, zPolaron outperforms all baselines, with gains evident across structural, interaction, and evolutionary dimensions. Wet-lab experiments further confirm its utility in functional enzyme screening and design: the optimized CalA6-D205A-S160G mutant achieves a 17.84-fold improvement in activity, while the CalB-I121M mutant yields a 1.91-fold increase. Together, these results show that integrating interaction and evolutionary information fills the missing puzzle of inverse folding, enhancing protein fitness prediction beyond structural compatibility. zPolaron is available at https://github.com/zelixirSH/zPolaron.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.