Back

RGI-Toolkit: Differentiable Restraints for Controllable Biomolecular Structure Prediction

Hori, T.; Moriwaki, Y.; Ishitani, R.

2026-10-06 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.10.05.756905 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Diffusion-based models have substantially advanced biomolecular structure prediction. Within this framework, restraint-guided inference (RGI) corrects the denoiser output at each reverse-diffusion step using a differentiable restraint loss, allowing available experimental information, stereochemical requirements, or a specified target conformational state to be incorporated into predictions without retraining the model. Here, we present RGI-Toolkit, a general-purpose Python library that makes RGI available for a range of structure predictors. The toolkit consolidates restraint definition, atom selection, loss evaluation, and coordinate optimization into a shared, backend-agnostic engine, limiting predictor-specific code to a thin preprocessing adapter and a single hook in the denoising loop. Restraints on distances, angles, and dihedrals, on deviations from reference structures, and on user-defined reaction coordinates, together with ligand conformer restraints, are all specified in a common configuration format. The toolkit currently supports six predictors, including AlphaFold3. Across all six predictors, conformer restraints eliminated chirality and cis/trans errors in the predicted ligands and improved their local geometry, while geometric and custom restraints systematically shifted the sampled protein conformations toward the specified target states. RGI-Toolkit thus provides a unified framework for integrating experimental information and prior geometric knowledge into structure prediction and for generating biomolecular structures with specified conformational and stereochemical properties.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.