Back

Mapping reward processing circuits: the orbitofrontal-nucleus accumbens white matter pathways and their associations to psychopathological traits

Mezzano, S.; Saini, F.; Orbecchi, V.; Fernandez-Borkel, T.; Raghavan, M.; Irfanoglu, M.; Beyh, A.; Dell'Acqua, F.

2026-10-11 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.10.05.756857 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Dysfunctions in reward circuits, including projections from the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) to the nucleus accumbens (NAcc), have been implicated in psychopathology. The OFC is functionally divided into the medial OFC (mOFC), which processes rewards, and the lateral OFC (lOFC), which responds to non-reward or punishment stimuli. We investigated the structural connectivity of the lOFC-NAcc and mOFC-NAcc pathways and their associations with psychopathological traits using tractography-defined ROI analysis. Diffusion-weighted imaging data from 165 participants (aged 22 - 35, 53% male) in the Human Connectome Project (HCP) were analysed using spherical deconvolution tractography. MegaTrack, a novel tool, enabled tract segmentation via a single manual dissection mapped back to native space. Virtual dissection identified four bilateral pathways connecting the lOFC and mOFC to the NAcc, from which fractional anisotropy (FA) was extracted, and an lOFC/mOFC ratio was computed. Psychopathological traits were measured using HCP Achenbach Adult Self-Report scores. The lOFC-NAcc pathway showed positive associations with psychopathology and the mOFC-NAcc pathway negative associations. The lOFC/mOFC ratio emerged as a stronger predictor than individual pathways, with significant associations for depression, somatic problems, anti-social personality traits, and inattention. Effects were lateralized to the left hemisphere. These findings show that the lOFC-NAcc and mOFC-NAcc pathways can be structurally separated with tractography and display opposing correlations with psychopathological traits in a healthy population. Their ratio may index reward-processing dysfunction, and future research should test whether it is sensitive to dysfunction in clinical populations.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.