Integrating single-cell and bulk transcriptomes identifies neuronal heat-stress-associated candidate genes in a reef-building coral
Li, R.; Tresguerres, M.; Kenkel, C. D.
Show abstract
Cell-type-specific molecular responses are obscured in bulk RNA sequencing, whereas generating matched single-cell datasets across environmental conditions remains costly and technically challenging, particularly in non-model organisms. Here, we present a workflow that integrates existing bulk and single-cell RNA-seq resources to prioritize cell-type-associated environmental-response genes. We demonstrate the workflow by examining heat-stress-associated neuronal genes in the reef-building coral Stylophora pistillata. Neuronal genes were first identified based on cell type-specific expression in single-cell transcriptomic data and then intersected with differentially expressed genes from bulk RNA-seq datasets under heat-stress. In parallel, we applied a deconvolution approach to infer cell type-specific expression changes directly from bulk data, independently capturing neuronal transcriptional responses. This integrated pipeline reduced thousands of heat-responsive genes previously identified in bulk RNA-seq studies to nine heat-associated, neuron-enriched candidates. Eight of the nine candidates showed their highest mean expression in the same neuronal subcluster. Targeted sequence-based characterization supported the identification of a TRPA-family ion channel, two calmodulin/centrin-family Ca2+-binding proteins, and a Class A/rhodopsin-like GPCR of unresolved ligand specificity. Two additional candidates were predicted secreted proteins belonging to conserved coral protein families, while the molecular functions of the remaining candidates remained unresolved. Their coordinated regulation suggests heat-associated remodeling of neuronal sensory and intracellular signaling processes. Our workflow provides a scalable framework for extracting cell type-associated molecular responses from existing transcriptomic resources and prioritizing candidates for further investigation. More broadly, it offers a generalizable strategy for investigating cell type-specific gene expression responses across organisms, cell types, and environmental conditions without requiring new single-cell datasets.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Thermal preconditioning in a reef-building coral alleviates oxidative damage through a BI-1 mediated antioxidant response 92%
- Ocean acidification induces subtle shifts in gene expression and DNA methylation in mantle tissue of the Eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) 92%
- Exposure to global change and microplastics elicits an immune response in an endangered coral 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcriptomic stability or lability explains sensitivity to climate stressors in coralline algae 92%
- Developmental series of gene expression clarifies maternal mRNA provisioning and maternal-to-zygotic transition in the reef-building coral Montipora capitata 91%
- Differential DNA methylation in Pacific oyster reproductive tissue in response to ocean acidification 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- STAGdb: a 30K SNP genotyping array and Science Gateway for Acropora corals and their dinoflagellate symbionts 92%
- Characterization of coral-associated microbial aggregates (CAMAs) within tissues of the coral Acropora hyacinthus 92%
- Uncovering mechanisms of global ocean change effects on the Dungeness crab (Cancer magister) through metabolomics analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Heat stress disrupts early development and photosymbiosis in Cassiopea jellyfish 91%
- Rapid, high-throughput phenotypic profiling of endosymbiotic dinoflagellates (Symbiodiniaceae) using benchtop flow cytometry 91%
- AquaX: An enhanced and revised AquaMaps framework to model marine species distributions and biodiversity 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.