Back

PepRePs: Peptide-Retargeted Phosphatases Designed with Generative Language Models

Hong, L.; Ho, T.-C.; Tseng, Y.-S.; Vincoff, S.; Chen, T.; Donahue, T. C.; DeLisa, M. P.; Chen, P.-H.; Chatterjee, P.

2026-10-06 synthetic biology
10.64898/2026.10.05.756719 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Phosphorylation is a fast, reversible layer of post-translational control that directly governs protein activity, signaling flux, and cell state. Kinases and phosphatases collectively establish these phosphorylation states, but their dysregulation drives cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, and developmental disorders. Selectively manipulating the phosphorylation of individual proteins in cells remains challenging, particularly for disordered substrates. Here, we introduce Peptide-Retargeted Phosphatases (PepRePs), a genetically encoded system that fuses a peptide binder to a serine/threonine phosphatase subunit to localize phosphatase activity to a target protein. We first establish the PepReP architecture using characterized tau-binding peptides, then apply protein language model-guided peptide design to target Rab8A, PTEN, and STAT3. Across endogenous and exogenous targets, PepRePs reduce phosphorylation, with downstream effects on tau aggregation, Rab8A-associated protein interactions, and cellular proliferation following PTEN and STAT3 targeting. Sequence-based peptide design enables targeting without structural inputs, supporting application to substrates with disordered regions that challenge conventional structure-based binder design. By coupling programmable peptide binders with modular phosphatase subunits, PepRePs enable targeted control of protein phosphorylation to probe cellular signaling and develop strategies for correcting disease-associated protein dysfunction.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.