Mutation-biased adaptation: The Yampolsky-Stoltzfus model revisited
Park, S.-C.; Krug, J.
Show abstract
The Yampolsky-Stoltzfus (YS) model provided the first formal demonstration that a bias in the introduction of new mutations can shape the direction of adaptive evolution, even when mutation rates are small relative to selection coefficients. Despite its foundational role, the model has been characterized almost entirely by simulation and closed-form solutions for its central quantity, the probability PA that a mutationally favored but less-fit genotype fixes ahead of a rarer, fitter alternative, have been available only in the limiting regimes of vanishing mutation supply and infinite population size. Here we derive closed-form approximations for PA across the intermediate regime of finite population size and appreciable mutation supply that lies between these two limits. Under strong selection between the competing mutants, we combine an establishment-probability argument with clonal interference theory to obtain an explicit expression for PA that accounts for both the ongoing input of the mutationally favored mutation and the frequency-dependent establishment probability of its competitor. Under weak selection between competing mutants, we derive a complementary expression based on the fixation of a mixed population under Kimura's classical formula. Both expressions agree closely with direct simulation of the underlying Wright-Fisher process, recover the known limiting cases, and remain consistent with one another over a substantial intermediate range of parameters. These results are expected to provide a basis for assessing how the strength of mutation bias affects adaptation in empirical data.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evolution of specialization in heterogeneous environments: equilibrium between selection, mutation and migration 97%
- Population genetics of polymorphism and divergence in rapidly evolving populations 97%
- Modeling the genetic footprint of fluctuating balancing selection: From the local to the genomic scale 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Life history and deleterious mutation rate coevolution 97%
- STOCHASTIC ECO-EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS OF MULTIVARIATE TRAITS: A Framework for Modeling Population Processes Illustrated by the Study of Drifting G-Matrices 97%
- The components of directional and disruptive selection in heterogeneous group-structured populations 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.