Back

Overexpression of Active or Inactive RNase J Disrupts Chloroplast RNA Quality Control in Arabidopsis

Gartner, S.; Bougearel, C.; Schuster, G.; Castandet, B.; Stern, D. B.; Baudry, K.

2026-10-06 plant biology
10.64898/2026.10.05.756640 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The chloroplast is a semi-autonomous organelle with a compact genome encoding ~100 expressed genes. Numerous and widespread promoters coupled with inefficient transcription termination leads to a highly complex primary transcriptome that undergoes extensive RNA quality control orchestrated by RNA binding proteins and ribonucleases. Among the ribonucleases, only RNase J (RNJ) is absolutely required for plant germination and survival, likely because its deficiency leads to massive accumulation of antisense RNA which inhibits translation. As one approach to understanding the selectivity of RNJ for antisense RNA and noncoding regions, we created Arabidopsis lines overexpressing catalytically inactive versions of the enzyme designed to trap its substrates. Initially, transgenic plants appeared phenotypically normal. However, crosses used to generate homozygous transgenic lines yielded progeny that developed varying degrees of chlorosis within 2-3 weeks. Concomitantly, these plants exhibited chloroplast transcriptome alterations similar to RNJ-silenced lines, along with mRNA changes consistent with retrograde signaling. This chlorosis could be correlated to the likely decay of RNJ protein, but not its endogenous transcript. The result could be replicated by attempting to overexpress a wild-type version of RNJ, in which case even one transgene copy was sufficient to induce chlorosis. Our results suggest that RNJ is under protein expression level surveillance to prevent wholesale destruction of the plastid transcriptome.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.