Back

Heterotrophic succession of invertebrate assemblages on fallen guava fruits in a tropical grove

Biswas, S.; Bhattacharyya, S.

2026-10-06 ecology
10.64898/2026.10.05.756615 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Fallen fleshy fruits are temporary resource patches that can support diverse but transient invertebrate assemblages, yet their successional dynamics remain poorly documented in tropical landscapes modified by human activity. We examined heterotrophic succession on fallen ripe guava fruits, Psidium guajava, in a tropical grove in Barasat, West Bengal, India. Eight fruits were placed in exposed and shaded microhabitats and followed from fresh to degraded stages over 22 days. Invertebrates were recorded using repeated scan sampling, and daily observations for each fruit were analysed for taxon richness, Shannon diversity, total peak relative abundance, community composition and indicator taxa associated with decomposition stages. Across 141 daily fruit observations, we recorded 44 invertebrate taxa. Taxon richness, Shannon diversity and total peak relative abundance were highest during fresh and pre rotten stages and declined sharply during post rotten and degraded stages. Decomposition stage was the strongest predictor of alpha diversity, resource use intensity and community composition, whereas differences between exposed and shaded microhabitats were weaker. Indicator taxa showed clear successional replacement: fresh fruits were associated with drosophilid and tephritid flies; fresh and pre rotten fruits with nitidulid beetles and ants; and later stages with collembolans, staphylinids, blattodeans and other taxa associated with detrital stages. Ants, especially Pheidole sp., were conspicuous resource users and showed guarding, hoarding, predation and pulp or seed removal behaviour, although their effects on other taxa remain observational. These results show that fallen guava fruits function as ephemeral heterotrophic resource patches, supporting rapid invertebrate turnover at fine temporal scales in a tropical grove.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.