Nicotinic modulation of frontal circuits breaks the cycle of attentional performance failure
Nishioka, T.; Norman, K.; Garkun, Y.; Riceberg, J.; Waltrip, L.; Bicks, L.; Singh, A.; Serratelli, A.; Mankouskaya, T.; Maccario, P.; Allen, S.; Bateh, J.; Cho, C.; Caro, K.; Lopez, S.; Kawatake-Kuno, A.; Li, H.; Li, Y.; Wu, X.; O'loughlin, T.; Akbarian, S.; Morishita, H.
Show abstract
The ability to recover from consecutive failures is critical for adaptive behavior, yet the underlying neural mechanisms remain unclear. In vivo screening of neuromodulatory inputs onto frontal-sensory cognitive control circuit identified a frontal cholinergic mechanism that counteracts lapses in attentional engagement following repeated errors. Cholinergic input from the basal forebrain to the frontal cortex was necessary and sufficient to restore performance after errors, specifically after repeated-but not after a single-failure. This effect was mediated by 7-nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in frontal-sensory cortical neurons, which sustained cortical circuit activity and frontal-sensory cortical oscillations during attentional engagement. Targeted optogenetic activation of these frontal-sensory neurons disrupted cycles of attentional performance failure and reinstated behavioral performance in a mouse model of neuropsychiatric syndrome. These findings reveal a circuit-level mechanism of cholinergic control that confers cognitive resilience under conditions of persistent failure.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A direct lateral entorhinal cortex to hippocampal CA2 circuit conveys social information required for social memory 94%
- Transient developmental increase of prefrontal activity alters network maturation and causes cognitive dysfunction in adult mice 94%
- A cortical circuit for orchestrating oromanual food manipulation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.