Back

Burrow disturbance, renovation, and collapse in a cavity-nesting seabird

Robinson, L. W.; Jones, P. L.; Mauck, R. A.; Grady, J.; Taylor, L. U.

2026-10-06 ecology
10.64898/2026.10.05.756071 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Researcher disturbance can alter the behavior, survival, and breeding success of wildlife, with effects that are especially well-documented in waterbirds. Anecdotal reports suggest that disturbance can even cause cavity-nesting species to alter the structure of their nests. We used a long-term study of a burrowing seabird, the Leach's Storm-Petrel (Hydrobates leucorhous), to ask whether storm-petrels renovate existing burrows and whether such renovation is related to a history of researcher disturbance. Our study was conducted at the Bowdoin Scientific Station on Kent Island, New Brunswick, Canada, where in 2024 we measured the burrow architecture of 363 burrows, including length and structure for occupied and unoccupied burrows both inside and outside a long-term study site with consistent research activity. Of these, 150 burrows had been measured in 2006, allowing for direct longitudinal comparison of burrow architecture. Nearly all burrows changed in length over the 18-year study period (mean absolute change = 20.8 cm +- 18.2 SD). A linear model revealed two contrasting processes of burrow length change: more frequently occupied burrows grew longer, whereas initially longer burrows shortened towards mean burrow length (~50 cm) through collapse. Occupied burrows inside the long-term study site were on average 34% longer and significantly more complex than burrows adjacent to the site, suggesting that researcher disturbance directly or indirectly reshapes burrows. Overall, these results show that storm-petrel burrows are shaped by cycles of renovation and subsequent collapse that may be exacerbated by human disturbance. Given ongoing population declines in storm-petrels and other cavity-nesting seabirds, this study emphasizes the need to balance scientific research with minimizing disturbance, particularly in long-term studies.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.