OGTT Early C-Peptide Index for Clamp-Measured Acute Beta-Cell Secretory Capacity
Zhang, R.
Show abstract
Acute glucose-stimulated beta-cell secretion is a key dimension of beta-cell function, but the hyperglycemic clamp used to assess it is technically demanding and resource-intensive, limiting its use at scale. We aimed to develop and validate the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) Early C-peptide (OEC) Index for estimating clamp-derived acute C-peptide response to glucose (ACPRg). We defined OEC as the 0-60-min incremental C-peptide area under the curve (AUC) normalized to the geometric mean of incremental and total glucose AUCs, with a fasting-glucose correction of 100/G0. OEC was evaluated in paired OGTT-clamp data from RISE Adult Medication (baseline n=257; internal validation) and BetaFat (baseline n=70; external validation). Predictive R^2 and Pearson r for log-ACPRg were assessed using participant-level 5-fold cross-validation in RISE and external validation without refitting in BetaFat, with the C-peptidogenic, insulinogenic, and CIR30 indices as comparators. In RISE Adult, cross-validated R^2 for OEC was 0.47, 0.61, and 0.54 at baseline, 12, and 15 months, respectively, with corresponding Pearson r of 0.69, 0.78, and 0.74; nested cross-validation showed only modest attenuation. Applied without refitting in BetaFat, OEC yielded R^2 of 0.55, 0.41, and 0.39 at baseline, 12, and 24 months, with corresponding r of 0.76, 0.70, and 0.64. OEC had higher predictive R^2 point estimates than all three comparators at every visit in both cohorts. OEC provides a simple, transparent OGTT-based estimate of acute beta-cell secretory capacity that retained predictive performance in BetaFat and may broaden access to physiological assessment of early beta-cell function.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Discovery of biomarkers for glycaemic deterioration before and after the onset of type 2 diabetes: an overview of the data from the epidemiological studies within the IMI DIRECT Consortium 92%
- Circulating metabolites and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a prospective study of 11,896 young adults from four Finnish cohorts 91%
- Circulating Metabolites in Progression to Islet Autoimmunity and Type 1 Diabetes 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Low-level mosaic variants causing the pancreatic disease congenital hyperinsulinism can be detected from blood DNA 91%
- Daily variation in blood glucose levels during continuous enteral nutrition in patients on the Intensive Care Unit: a retrospective observational study 90%
- Precision Diagnostic Approach to Predict 5-year Risk for Microvascular Complications in Type 1 Diabetes 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Morning Glucagon Disrupts Insulin Induced Hepatic Metabolic Memory and Subsequent Afternoon Glucose Metabolism in Canines 90%
- Metabolic Drivers of Dysglycemia in Pregnancy: Ethnic-Specific GWAS of 146 Metabolites and 1-Sample Mendelian Randomisation Analyses in a UK Multi-Ethnic Birth Cohort 89%
- Observational assessments of the relationship of dietary and pharmacological treatment on continuous measures of dysglycemia over 24 hours in women with gestational diabetes 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk-stratified lifestyle intervention to prevent type 2 diabetes 90%
- Improved specificity of glutamate decarboxylase 65 autoantibody measurement using luciferase-based immunoprecipitation system (LIPS) assays 90%
- MODY is prevalent in later-onset diabetes, has potential for targeted therapy but is challenging to identify 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrated miRNA_mRNA Analysis Reveals Dysregulated Regulatory Networks in Visceral Adipose Tissue Linked to Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes 91%
- Hepatic and abdominal adiposity in type 2 diabetes as assessed with machine learning on CT scans 91%
- Subgroups of adult-onset diabetes: a prospective follow-up study of progression of insulin resistance and deficiency and association with liver steatosis and fibrosis 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.