Back

Accelerated high-capacity 6 mA transcranial direct current stimulation for major depression: an open-label pilot study

Olash, C.; Collins, E.; Smani, D.; Cox, S. S.; Bikson, M.; Donnery, K.; FallahRad, M.; Koochesfahani, M. B.; Miron, J.-P.; Latham, C.; Freels, D.; Chasen, J.; George, M. S.

2026-10-07 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.10.05.26364655 medRxiv
Show abstract

Home-based 2 mA transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for depression, but tDCS amplitude has been limited largely by skin tolerance, and higher-intensity, accelerated dosing may be more efficacious or faster-acting. Using a novel high-capacity tDCS (HC-tDCS) stimulator and hydrogel electrodes, we evaluated the safety, tolerability and feasibility of accelerated HC-tDCS (20-minute bifrontal 6 mA sessions, twice daily for five days) in 20 patients with major depressive disorder. A Safety Review Committee reviewed data from the first three participants, who completed a within-day escalation to 6 mA, before the remaining 17 were enrolled. Retention and adherence were 100% (203 of 203 sessions), and 19/20 tolerated the full 6 mA amplitude without dose reduction. There were no serious adverse events. The most common symptoms were fatigue (49% of sessions), burning (46%) and tingling (43%) at the electrode, and difficulty concentrating (40%). Electrode-site erythema occurred in all participants, with no severe reaction or skin breakdown. At 1 week, 7 of 20 reported a residual skin change, mostly peeling or redness, none painful; at 1 month, hyperpigmentation at the electrode site persisted in 2 participants, both Black. At the end of the five-day course, PHQ-9 scores decreased from 15.8 to 7.2 (Hedges g = 1.62); 50% of participants responded, 45% remitted, and improvement was maintained at 1-month follow-up. Accelerated HC-tDCS was feasible, well tolerated, and warrants a sham-controlled trial.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.