The impact of hospital waiting lists on labour market outcomes: quasi-experimental evidence from musculoskeletal treatment in England
Aston, H.; Nafilyan, V.; Meacock, R.; Ayoubkhani, D.
Show abstract
We analyse the effect of waiting time for elective musculoskeletal treatment on labour market outcomes in England using hospital records for working-age adults who received treatment between April 2015 and March 2023 to Census, tax and benefit records. To address clinical prioritisation and unobserved severity, we leveraged provider-level waiting time as an instrument for individual waiting time and estimated two-stage least squares models adjusted for baseline labour market outcomes, demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, and provider, referral-time and procedure fixed effects. We find that longer waits reduce annual employee earnings, with effects persisting for up to five years. For an additional four weeks of waiting, the largest estimated annual losses range from {pound}301 for osteoarthritis to {pound}487 for other joint disorders. There was no evidence of effects on employment status or benefit receipt, suggesting that delays primarily operate through reduced productivity or hours worked among those who remain employed. Reducing waiting times may not only improve health outcomes but help patients maintain earnings and support economic
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Impact of Physician-Patient Gender Match on Healthcare Quality: An Experiment in China 91%
- Excess Mortality during the Covid-19 pandemic: Early evidence from England and Wales 90%
- Association of COVID-19 employment disruption with mental and social wellbeing: evidence from nine UK longitudinal studies 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling the impact of lockdown easing measures on cumulative COVID-19 cases and deaths in England 91%
- Inequality in access to health and care services during lockdown - Findings from the COVID-19 survey in five UK national longitudinal studies 91%
- Inequalities in healthcare disruptions during the Covid-19 pandemic: Evidence from 12 UK population-based longitudinal studies 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rapid Epidemiological Analysis of Comorbidities and Treatments as risk factors for COVID-19 in Scotland (REACT-SCOT): a population-based case-control study 89%
- Information nudges for influenza vaccination: Evidence from a large-scale cluster-randomized controlled trial 89%
- CoMix: Changes in social contacts as measured by the contact survey during the COVID-19 pandemic in England between March 2020 and March 2021 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Projected geographic disparities in healthcare worker absenteeism from COVID-19 school closures and the economic feasibility of child care subsidies: a simulation study 92%
- Parental Income Gradients in Adult Health: A National Cohort Study 91%
- Health impacts of takeaway management zones around schools in six different local authorities across England: a public health modelling study using PRIMEtime 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Does Contact Tracing Work? Quasi-Experimental Evidence from an Excel Error in England 91%
- School closures and SARS-CoV-2. Evidence from Sweden’s partial school closure 90%
- The Association of Opening K-12 Schools and Colleges with the Spread of COVID-19 in the United States: County-Level Panel Data Analysis 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.